Is javmix.tv safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
26/100

context safety score

A score of 26/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
50
content
0
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

obfuscated code

A heavily obfuscated JavaScript block tagged '<!-- Pops -->' uses URI-encoded string decoding, character-rotation ciphering, and array slicing to conceal its payload and behavior. The script loads an external resource from 'alfalfaemployeeresource.com' and contains logic to detect browser/UA type, suggesting a pop-under or redirect ad network payload that evades static analysis. (location: page.html:367-369 (<!-- Pops --> script block))

high

malicious redirect

Script at '//alfalfaemployeeresource.com/on.js' is loaded asynchronously with 'data-cfasync=false' (bypasses Cloudflare protection) and is associated with the obfuscated pop-under script. The domain 'alfalfaemployeeresource.com' is a known pop/redirect ad network domain used to deliver unwanted redirects or malicious pop-unders to visitors. (location: page.html:369)

medium

social engineering

Third-party ad network 'a.magsrv.com' (MagSrv) is injected via inline script with 'async' loading and a push-based AdProvider pattern. MagSrv is a known adult ad network frequently associated with deceptive ad creatives including fake virus warnings, fake download buttons, and forced redirects targeting unsuspecting users. (location: page.html:189-192, 293-295, 327-329)

low

hidden content

jQuery is loaded twice: once from the site's own CDN (jquery.min.js v3.7.1) and again from code.jquery.com (jquery-1.11.0.min.js, an outdated version). The second inclusion is loaded after the body open tag outside of the WordPress asset pipeline, suggesting it may have been injected separately to support the obfuscated pop script or other non-disclosed functionality. (location: page.html:43-44 and page.html:155-157)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/javmix.tv

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is javmix.tv safe for AI agents to use?

javmix.tv currently scores 26/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.