context safety score
A score of 33/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
malicious redirect
Third-party ad network link at cdn.tapioni.com loads an external ad embed script (asg_embed.js) with unresolved macro placeholder '%subid1%' in the data-subid1 attribute, indicating a tracking/redirect ad injection chain from an untrusted CDN domain with no content integrity verification. (location: page.html:41 - <script src='//cdn.tapioni.com/asg_embed.js' data-spots='262182' data-subid1='%subid1%'>)
malicious redirect
Multiple navigation links and ad banners redirect through t.fluxtrck.site, a known adult traffic broker/redirect tracking domain. URLs contain unresolved template variable '{banner}' (cv1=%7Bbanner%7D), indicating server-side variable injection or tracking chain that resolves destination dynamically at click time, obscuring the final destination. (location: page.html:62,79,484,1574 - href='https://t.fluxtrck.site/c1/...')
malicious redirect
Iframe and navigation links route through go.mnaspm.com with a long opaque hash path. This domain is an adult traffic redirect/monetization broker. The iframe (728x90) is injected as a section-level ad with no label, embedding third-party content directly in the page layout, and the destination URL is fully obfuscated behind the hash parameter. (location: page.html:65,487,962 - href/src='https://go.mnaspm.com/smartpop/...')
malicious redirect
Footer 'backup URL' link (備用網址) points to a GitHub user repository (github.com/aj23koby4495612/aj23koby4495612) rather than an official jable.tv domain. This is a deceptive redirect disguised as a legitimate site backup link, potentially redirecting users to attacker-controlled content. (location: page.html:1925 - href='https://github.com/aj23koby4495612/aj23koby4495612')
malicious redirect
A section-level ad link using HTTP (not HTTPS) points to uug27.com, a third-party adult site. The use of plain HTTP downgrades transport security and the destination domain is unrelated to jable.tv, indicating a potentially unsafe outbound redirect embedded as an inline banner ad. (location: page.html:1203 - href='http://uug27.com/')
malicious redirect
Footer link to fuu78.com (裸聊 live stream) and navigation links to fuu79.com and 141jj.com are third-party adult platform outbound redirects embedded in site navigation, bypassing any content labeling or user consent flow. (location: page.html:68,76,490,496,1900 - href='https://fuu79.com', 'https://141jj.com', 'https://fuu78.com')
social engineering
An ad unit disguised as a regular video listing item ('他們在看' / 'They Are Watching' section) promotes a paid subscription service with the text '[限時優惠] 只需1元即可無限下載' (Limited-time offer: unlimited downloads for just 1 yuan), creating false urgency and deceptive placement within organic content listings to manipulate users into clicking a monetization redirect link. (location: page.html:1574-1584 - ad unit in '他們在看' section linking to t.fluxtrck.site)
hidden content
The pageContext JavaScript object sets 'disableStats: true' immediately followed inline by a loginUrl assignment on the same line with unusual whitespace/tab padding, suggesting intentional obfuscation of the inline script structure to hide configuration values from casual inspection. (location: page.html:19 - var pageContext = { disableStats: true, loginUrl: '...' })
hidden content
A third-party native ad script from a.magsrv.com is injected inline within a video listing grid column (data-idzone=3377859), blending an ad network loader with organic content and making it invisible to users as a distinct ad unit. (location: page.html:1250 - <script data-idzone='3377859' src='https://a.magsrv.com/nativeads-v2.js'>)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/jable.tvCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
jable.tv currently scores 33/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.