Is inporn.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
43/100

context safety score

A score of 43/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

14 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

obfuscated code

Large Base64-encoded blobs stored in JavaScript variables (cGAm2MphS, fqp3VeZWI) at page load. The variable named cGAm2MphS decodes to ad-server configuration referencing 'actman.obfuscated.js', explicitly naming obfuscation. The payload is loaded via a dynamically constructed script src '/livesmatter/holly7.10.13.bccb68bf9b7da5f3d8345aad076e917b.js' with a hash fingerprint, obscuring the actual ad engine being loaded. (location: page.html:64-66)

high

malicious redirect

Popunder/tabunder ad system is configured to open new tabs or windows on user interaction (clicks on video player, thumbnails, page body). The popunder engine uses spot_id 7854 and is bound to nearly the entire page UI including '.jwplayer', '.thumb', '.__bai-overlay', and 'body' (when nplimit=1). This silently redirects users to third-party ad networks without consent, including liguhayrhe.com and other traffic broker domains. (location: page.html:411-519, 846-854)

high

malicious redirect

Push notification subscription interstitial configured with a directLink to 'https://online-hd.amazingcontent.site/?tag_id=93577&cl=3&click=1' — a suspicious domain used as a fallback redirect when a user interacts with push notification prompts. This can redirect users to unknown/potentially malicious content outside the site. (location: page.html:68 (subInterstitialSettings.directLink))

high

social engineering

'UNLOCK PREMIUM' button (window._plBtnText) and 'FULL VIDEO HERE' CTA are dynamically injected over video content as an overlay (.__bai-overlay with z-index 99999). This deceptively implies a content gate to extract clicks and redirect users to affiliate adult subscription sites (fhgte.com, javhd.com, g2fame.com, 1passforallsites.com). The overlay covers the player to trick users into clicking affiliate links. (location: page.html:72-97)

medium

social engineering

Top bar ad with text 'AI Undress. Make Anybody Naked. Upload Image Generate Video' with a 'TRY FREE' button links to nudeai.fun — a non-consensual AI image manipulation service promoted through deceptive free-trial framing targeting users in high-value GEOs (US, UK, DE, FR, etc.). (location: page.html:213-221)

medium

social engineering

Tab link titled '🔥AI CUM SLUT' (hlink_1) links to s.traf-gold.online traffic broker for GEO-targeted users, and '🔥AI porn' linking to candyai.gg for others. These are deceptive tab-link ads using sensational/explicit titles to drive clicks to external affiliate/adult AI platforms. (location: page.html:108-130)

medium

hidden content

The .partners-wrap CSS class is set to 'display: none' via an inline style block, hiding partner/affiliate link content from the visible page. This conceals partner tracking or link content from users and scanners while it may still be active in the DOM. (location: page.html:56-60)

medium

obfuscated code

The ad tag loader script at '/ocbxu9zk8a/4dsew1ob5s.js' is loaded via a dynamically constructed call using an obfuscated random-looking path segment. The initialization object '_hncd91ha4r' contains full ad format configuration including push notification spots and interstitial redirect URLs, all encoded within a single window variable to evade static analysis. (location: page.html:68-70)

medium

malicious redirect

The delegate-ch HTTP meta tag delegates sensitive client hint headers (sec-ch-ua, sec-ch-ua-platform, sec-ch-ua-full-version-list, sec-ch-ua-mobile, etc.) to tsyndicate.com — a third-party ad/traffic syndication domain. This allows tsyndicate.com to fingerprint users' browsers, OS, and device details without explicit user consent. (location: page.html:55)

medium

malicious redirect

Yandex Metrika (mc.yandex.ru) analytics tag is loaded unconditionally for all non-Lighthouse user agents, sending browsing behavior, click maps, and session data to Yandex servers. For users in Western countries this constitutes cross-border data transfer to a Russian state-adjacent entity. (location: page.html:46-51)

low

hidden content

Ad configuration variables (window.EoCR4, window.vf_keys with site API keys, window._campControl, window._hl, window._h2) are embedded inline in the page script but never rendered visibly. They contain internal routing keys, site API keys (e.g. 'sU5aXD9iHnTnjvg6QZ2s7fkReMNpHqMgO8JFBybZ'), and traffic source tracking logic invisible to users. (location: page.html:23, 299-304)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/inporn.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is inporn.com safe for AI agents to use?

inporn.com currently scores 43/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.