Is icegay.tv safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
35/100

context safety score

A score of 35/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
50
behavior
80
content
14
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

malicious redirect

Third-party redirect engine 'trustpielote.com' loaded via renderer.js script with async execution. Navigation menu links (zones=300, 301, 302) all route through this domain. The hpRdrConfig sets ignoreIfNotVisible: false enabling unconditional redirect triggering. This is a known adult ad/redirect network that can deliver popunders and forced redirects to arbitrary destinations. (location: page.html:9071, page.html:190-198, page.html:9070)

high

malicious redirect

Tab-under (popunder) attack explicitly configured: window.hpPpConfig sets tabUnder: true with triggerMethod: 2 and a 24-hour cooldown period. This silently opens a new tab to an advertiser-controlled URL when users click gallery or category links, redirecting behind the current tab without clear user consent. (location: page.html:9060-9067)

medium

malicious redirect

External advertisement script loaded from 'stats.hprofits.com/advertisement.min.js' — an opaque, minified third-party ad script over which the site has no control. This domain is associated with adult traffic monetization networks and can serve dynamic redirect payloads. (location: page.html:22, page.html:9053)

medium

malicious redirect

Navigation link labeled 'VOD' routes to 'fhgte.com/gay' with UTM parameter utm_campaign=ai.CxY, an externally controlled domain unrelated to icegay.tv. The destination domain is opaque and could redirect users to arbitrary content or harvesting pages. (location: page.html:202)

low

hidden content

Meta referrer policy set to 'unsafe-url', which causes the full URL (including any query parameters containing tokens, session IDs, or sensitive data) to be sent as the Referer header to all third-party domains contacted by the page, including ad networks and analytics endpoints. (location: page.html:5)

low

social engineering

Navigation menu items labeled 'AI JERK OFF', 'Live Sex', 'HD Porn', and 'VOD' are styled identically to legitimate site navigation links but route to external third-party ad/redirect networks (trustpielote.com, fhgte.com). This disguises outbound commercial redirect links as first-party site navigation, deceiving users about their destination. (location: page.html:190-204)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/icegay.tv

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is icegay.tv safe for AI agents to use?

icegay.tv currently scores 35/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.