context safety score
A score of 43/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
brand impersonation
The site ice-casinos.org presents itself as 'IceCasino Casino Hungary' and mimics the branding, content, and style of the legitimate IceCasino brand (icecasino.com), while the footer explicitly disclaims: 'Az oldal ice-casinos.org nem kapcsolódik a márkához' (This site is not affiliated with the brand). The domain ice-casinos.org is a lookalike/affiliate site impersonating the IceCasino brand to attract and redirect users. (location: page.html:341, page.html:76-85, entire page content)
malicious redirect
All primary call-to-action links (screenshot link and 'Play Now' button) use href='#' with a Base64-encoded data attribute 'data-trrrfrwo' containing an obfuscated redirect URL. Decoding the Base64 value 'aHR0cHM6Ly90cmFmLWh1Yi5jb20vY2I0Z2w5ay5waHA_a2V5PXhrdXN3dmFqcmFoamUzeXIxbzBp' reveals: 'https://traf-hub.com/cb4gl9k.php?key=xkuswvajrahje3yr1o0i' — an external traffic broker/affiliate redirect endpoint. Users clicking these links are silently forwarded through a third-party traffic hub before reaching any destination. (location: page.html:102 (c-screenshot__link), page.html:239 (c-btn Play Now button))
obfuscated code
Outbound redirect URLs are Base64-encoded and stored in a custom HTML attribute 'data-trrrfrwo' rather than in standard href attributes. The JavaScript plugin 'wp-tt-second-offer-links/script.js' presumably decodes and executes these redirects at runtime, hiding the true destination from static inspection and link-preview tools. The attribute name 'trrrfrwo' itself appears randomized/obfuscated to evade pattern matching. (location: page.html:102, page.html:239, page.html:353 (wp-tt-second-offer-links script))
social engineering
The page uses aggressive persuasion tactics typical of affiliate gambling lures: repeated claims of being 'the best and most popular casino', safety guarantees ('secure gaming environment', 'encrypted technology'), urgency framing ('what are you waiting for? Register'), and extensive bonus listings (no-deposit bonus, welcome bonus, birthday gifts, VIP programs) to pressure visitors into registering and depositing on an unaffiliated lookalike site. (location: page.html:111-114, page-text.txt:13-17, page-text.txt:79-86)
phishing
The site solicits user registration including phone number, email address, password creation, and payment method selection (page-text.txt:147-150), while explicitly disclaiming it is not affiliated with the real IceCasino brand. Any credentials or financial data entered could be captured by the site operator rather than the legitimate casino. The domain is only 228 days old and impersonates an established brand. (location: page.html:241-248, page-text.txt:144-150, metadata.json (domain_age_days: 228))
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/ice-casinos.orgCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
ice-casinos.org currently scores 43/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.