Is hurawatch.tw safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
35/100

context safety score

A score of 35/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
50
content
0
graph
30

10 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

obfuscated code

A large, heavily obfuscated JavaScript block using interleaved character shuffling (split/reduce/join pattern with 'z' delimiter) is injected twice in the page — once in the <head> and once just before </body>. The code manipulates the DOM environment by overriding document methods, rewiring localStorage, intercepting querySelector, patching window properties, and creating a hidden sandboxed iframe context. This level of obfuscation is characteristic of anti-analysis evasion and covert data exfiltration or ad-fraud infrastructure. (location: page.html:50 and page.html:1337 (<script data-cfasync='false'>))

high

hidden content

A hidden <iframe> with src='https://sysmeasuring.net' and style='display:none' is injected at the bottom of the page body. Hidden iframes to third-party domains are a well-known vector for drive-by payload delivery, clickjacking, ad fraud, tracking without consent, and silent redirects. The domain name 'sysmeasuring.net' is not a known legitimate analytics provider. (location: page.html:1339 (<iframe style='display:none' src='https://sysmeasuring.net'>))

medium

hidden content

An <h1> tag inside a div with style='display:none' contains SEO-stuffed content ('Watch Series Online Free - Stream HD Movies & TV Shows on HuraWatch Alternatives site') that is hidden from users but visible to crawlers and AI agents. Additionally, a second <h1> in the footer has style='display:none'. Hidden keyword-stuffed headings are used to manipulate search rankings and AI agent content extraction. (location: page.html:56-61 and page.html:1106)

high

brand impersonation

The site operates on hurawatch.tw but the canonical og:url and all share buttons point to hurawatch.fm — a different domain. The site explicitly brands itself as a 'HuraWatch Alternatives site,' impersonating the well-known HuraWatch brand to capture its audience. The .tw TLD is used to evade blocks on other HuraWatch domains while mimicking the brand identity, logo, and content of the original service. (location: page.html:25 (og:url=https://hurawatch.fm/) and page.html:619 (data-url=https://hurawatch.fm/))

high

malicious redirect

A hidden zero-opacity or display-none iframe pointing to 'https://sysmeasuring.net' is loaded on every page visit. This constitutes an unsolicited third-party load that may trigger redirects, fingerprinting, or malvertising payloads without any user interaction or consent. Combined with the obfuscated JS that rewires document.querySelector and localStorage, silent background navigation or credential relay is plausible. (location: page.html:1339)

medium

social engineering

The page content repeatedly asserts 'Safe to Use: Verified by multiple antivirus programs' and 'HuraWatch is considered safe and legal' without any substantiation, while simultaneously hosting heavily obfuscated scripts and hidden iframes. This false safety reassurance is designed to lower user guard and encourage interaction (clicking play buttons, downloading the Android APK, or creating accounts) on an unverified piracy platform. (location: page.html:703 and page-text.txt:572)

medium

credential harvesting

The page presents modal login and registration forms collecting email address, password, name, and confirm password fields. The site is a piracy clone on a .tw TLD whose canonical URL points to a different domain (hurawatch.fm). Credentials submitted here are sent to an operator whose identity is obscured. Users who reuse passwords from legitimate services are at risk of credential harvesting. (location: page.html:1193-1227 (login form) and page.html:1272-1307 (register form))

low

social engineering

The page promotes an Android APK download ('/android-movies-apk') for an unofficial app outside of the Google Play Store. Sideloaded APKs from piracy sites are a common vector for mobile malware, adware, and spyware. The page frames this as an official app ('HuraWatch offers an official app for Android devices') without any verified source. (location: page.html:290 and page.html:1062-1065)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/hurawatch.tw

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is hurawatch.tw safe for AI agents to use?

hurawatch.tw currently scores 35/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.