Is hindixxxsite.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
43/100

context safety score

A score of 43/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
60
content
21
graph
30

9 threat patterns detected

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

malicious redirect

Back-button hijacking script uses history.pushState() in a loop (10 iterations) to trap users, then intercepts the popstate event to force a location.replace() redirect to 'https://backbutton.videobaba.xyz/back-button-script/public/getit.php?site=HXS'. This prevents normal browser back navigation and redirects users to an external third-party domain. The script appears twice in the page (head area and footer). (location: page.html:1091-1098 and page.html:1117-1138)

medium

malicious redirect

Third-party ad script loaded from 'blazingserver.net' via an iframe (zoneid=172) and async script tag. The domain 'blazingserver.net' is an ad-serving infrastructure not affiliated with the site; iframes from unvetted ad networks can serve drive-by download payloads or redirect users without consent. (location: page.html:334, page.html:640, page.html:1115)

medium

hidden content

Client hint delegation meta tag delegates detailed browser fingerprinting headers (sec-ch-ua, sec-ch-ua-bitness, sec-ch-ua-arch, sec-ch-ua-model, sec-ch-ua-platform, sec-ch-ua-platform-version, sec-ch-ua-full-version, sec-ch-ua-full-version-list, sec-ch-ua-mobile) to the third-party domain 'tsyndicate.com'. This silently exfiltrates device/browser fingerprint data to a third party without user awareness. (location: page.html:5)

low

hidden content

Analytics/tracking script loaded from 'stats.indianpornempire.com' with a data-domain attribute, enabling cross-site tracking of user behavior. The domain is a third-party tracker not disclosed in any privacy notice visible on the page. (location: page.html:32)

low

hidden content

Two obfuscated ad scripts loaded from 'namastedharma.com' with randomized filenames ('Xkqlsq5.js' and '0Mcg0B8.js') and data-spots/data-subid parameters. Randomized JS filenames are a common obfuscation technique to evade blocklists; the scripts execute arbitrary code with full DOM access. (location: page.html:1111-1113)

medium

social engineering

Ad units disguised as video thumbnails ('Instagram sexy reels - KamaReels.com') are injected inline among real video items with identical visual styling (duration, view counts, rating badge). The ads use a fake 90% rating and fabricated view count (8.8K) to appear as organic content, deceiving users into clicking affiliate/cam site links. (location: page.html:330-350, page.html:636-656)

low

social engineering

Navigation menu contains affiliate/referral links to external cam sites (kamareels2.com with ref=MF-HXC, dscgirls.live with affid=19, buzzvideoz.com with ref=MF-HXS) labeled as site navigation items ('सेक्स कैम्स', 'Sex Cams', 'Sexy Girls'), disguising monetized affiliate redirects as internal navigation. (location: page.html:66-68)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/hindixxxsite.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is hindixxxsite.com safe for AI agents to use?

hindixxxsite.com currently scores 43/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.