Is hdfilmizle.to safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
28/100

context safety score

A score of 28/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
60
content
0
graph
30

12 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

cloaking

Page loads content in transparent or zero-size iframe overlay

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

medium

social engineering

Site operates as an unauthorized free streaming platform distributing copyrighted content (HD films, series) without licensing, enticing users with free HD/4K access to popular titles. This creates a social-engineering lure that drives user registration and credential submission on a site with no verifiable legal standing. (location: page.html:8, page-text.txt:475, page.html:1113-1115)

high

credential harvesting

The site presents login (username + password), registration (email, username, password x2), and password-reset (email) modal forms that POST credentials to /login/, /register/, and /login/forgotPass/ endpoints on an unverified piracy domain. Users are encouraged to create accounts and submit personal credentials to a site with no WHOIS transparency (privacy redacted unknown, domain age unknown). (location: page.html:1170-1243, page-text.txt:1128-1196)

medium

malicious redirect

Footer SEO text contains an outbound link to a third-party domain (https://www.fullhdfilmizlesene.so/film) with target="_blank" and anchor text 'film izle', silently redirecting users to a different piracy/potentially malicious domain. The .so TLD (Somalia) is commonly associated with high-risk domains. (location: page.html:1160)

low

hidden content

Multiple HTML comments containing only the word 'wait' are scattered throughout the page (at least 20 instances), used as server-side template placeholders that may indicate dynamically injected content blocks (e.g., ads, scripts, tracking) not present in the static snapshot. The footer link section between FOOTER LINKLER: BEGIN and END is completely empty, suggesting content was stripped or is conditionally loaded. (location: page-hidden.txt:1-36, page.html:1152-1154)

low

social engineering

The 'Film İstekleri' (Film Requests) feature invites users to submit content requests, increasing engagement and session time on a piracy site, normalizing continued use and increasing likelihood of credential submission or exposure to malicious ads. (location: page.html:958-969, page-text.txt:919-921)

medium

obfuscated code

The inline script at page load (line 31) uses a minified, obfuscated block that sets cookies, conditionally modifies CSS layout based on a function _cg('go3'), and injects dynamic style elements. The function _cg is not defined in the visible HTML, suggesting it is loaded externally or injected at runtime. The cookie-setting function _cs writes a persistent 365-day cookie to the root domain. This pattern is consistent with ad-network or tracking fingerprinting scripts that conditionally activate based on user/session state. (location: page.html:31-34)

low

hidden content

All lazy-loaded images use a transparent SVG placeholder as the initial src attribute (data:image/svg+xml,...), which is standard practice, but combined with the 'wait' comment placeholders and empty footer link block, indicates significant portions of the page content are loaded asynchronously and not captured in the static scan, potentially including ad frames or tracking pixels. (location: page.html:157, 176, 195 (pattern repeated throughout))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/hdfilmizle.to

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is hdfilmizle.to safe for AI agents to use?

hdfilmizle.to currently scores 28/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.