context safety score
A score of 40/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
phishing
2 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host
brand impersonation
The site graphpad-prism.cn operates under a .cn TLD and claims to be 'GraphPad唯一中国官网' (GraphPad's only official China website), yet the legitimate GraphPad software is owned by Dotmatics and its official global site is www.graphpad.com. The .cn domain mimics the authentic brand name to deceive users into believing this is an authorized official channel. The site uses official GraphPad/Dotmatics logos, branding assets, and product imagery to reinforce this false legitimacy. (location: page.html:12-14, page.html:58, page.html:624, page.html:630)
phishing
The login link (登录) at the top of the page redirects users to https://alliancedg.cn/graphpad/ — a completely different third-party domain (alliancedg.cn) rather than the official graphpad.com. Users who attempt to log in to what they believe is the official GraphPad site are redirected to an unrelated domain where credentials could be harvested. (location: page.html:121-123)
credential harvesting
The login button labeled '登录' (Login) points to https://alliancedg.cn/graphpad/ rather than the legitimate GraphPad authentication endpoint at graphpad.com. Victims believing they are on the official Chinese GraphPad site and entering their GraphPad/Dotmatics account credentials would be submitting them to a third-party site (alliancedg.cn), enabling credential theft. (location: page.html:121-123)
malicious redirect
Login navigation redirects to https://alliancedg.cn/graphpad/, an off-domain third-party site unrelated to Dotmatics/GraphPad. Users expecting to authenticate with the official GraphPad portal are silently redirected away from the spoofed site to another unknown domain, a classic phishing redirect pattern. (location: page.html:121)
social engineering
The site falsely claims to be 'GraphPad唯一中国官网' (GraphPad's ONLY official China website) and prominently displays the ICP registration number (京ICP备19031821号-3) alongside the official GraphPad logo and branding to manufacture legitimacy. It also instructs users to visit www.graphpad.com for free trials, borrowing credibility from the real site while capturing user trust and purchasing activity on the fake domain. (location: page.html:630, page.html:14, page-text.txt:502-503)
hidden content
A hardcoded IP address '34.96.45.30' is assigned to the variable 'uid' in a JavaScript block that silently POSTs visitor tracking data (current URL and referrer) to the endpoint '?c=index&a=ajax_pageview'. This covert beacon exfiltrates visitor browsing context server-side without user awareness or consent. (location: page.html:670-685, page-text.txt:539-555)
hidden content
Multiple HTML comment blocks contain commented-out navigation links to other .cn domains (snapgene.cn, nquery.cn, geneious.cn, fcs-express.cn) and a previously visible popup div with a PDF download link referencing a Prism compatibility fix. These hidden elements suggest prior or planned distribution of files from the site that are no longer publicly visible but may still be accessible directly. (location: page.html:105-112, page.html:693-711)
hidden content
CSS uses IE-only 'expression()' in the style rule for '#leftsead', specifically 'top: expression(eval(document.documentElement.scrollTop))'. While largely inert in modern browsers, this is a legacy CSS expression injection pattern that could execute arbitrary JavaScript in older Internet Explorer environments. (location: page.html:744, page-text.txt:607)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/graphpad-prism.cnCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
graphpad-prism.cn currently scores 40/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.