context safety score
A score of 42/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
hidden content
1 hidden or tiny iframe elements detected
brand impersonation
The domain graniru.info impersonates the well-known Russian independent news outlet Grani.ru (grani.ru). The site uses the branding 'Грани-ТВ.Ру', displays copyright claiming 'Грани.Ру', and links extensively to grani-tv.ru and grani.ru, while operating on a different domain (graniru.info). This is a typosquat/domain impersonation of the original media brand. (location: page.html:4, page.html:894 - title tag and footer copyright)
credential harvesting
The page hosts a login form with username and password fields (login[name], login[password]) that POSTs to '/' on the impersonating domain graniru.info rather than the legitimate grani.ru. Users believing they are on the real Grani.ru site may submit credentials to this fraudulent domain. (location: page.html:69-85 - login form)
malicious redirect
A zero-size (width=0, height=0) invisible iframe loads content from 'https://asg.vidigital.ru/1/268/i/h' — a third-party ad/tracking network injected invisibly in the header. Zero-dimension iframes are a common vector for drive-by malware delivery, click fraud, or silent redirects. (location: page.html:30 - <iframe src='https://asg.vidigital.ru/1/268/i/h' width='0' height='0'>)
hidden content
A zero-size invisible iframe (width=0, height=0) is injected in the page header, rendering no visible content to users but loading external third-party content silently. This hidden element could be used for tracking, ad fraud, or malicious payload delivery. (location: page.html:30 - iframe with width=0 height=0 in #topad div)
hidden content
Footer contains a 'Browse these next' section with links to online gambling/betting sites ('ставки на спорт букмекерские конторы', 'Plinko игра', 'иностранные казино онлайн') pointing to russianseasons.org, lookinar.com, and immortalcities.com. This injected SEO spam content is visually styled to appear as legitimate site navigation and is inconsistent with the editorial news content, indicating unauthorized content injection or link farm activity. (location: page.html:892 - div after closing wrapper, before footer)
social engineering
The site presents itself as the legitimate Грани-ТВ video project of Гrani.Ru, complete with authentic-looking content (real news articles, real Russian public figures listed), creating a convincing impersonation that would deceive users into trusting the site and submitting login credentials or interacting with malicious third-party content. (location: page.html:250-253 - notice claiming to be official Гrani.Ru video project)
hidden content
A LiveInternet tracking script dynamically writes an img tag using document.write(), collecting referrer, screen dimensions, color depth, and current URL, then beacons this data to counter.yadro.ru. While common for Russian sites, the tracker exfiltrates detailed browser fingerprint data to a third-party domain. (location: page.html:202-210 - LiveInternet counter script)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/graniru.infoCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
graniru.info currently scores 42/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.