Is fsiblog.cc safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
45/100

context safety score

A score of 45/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
80
behavior
80
content
24
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

obfuscated code

Obfuscated popunder ad script using base64-encoded URLs (atob decoding) and a hardcoded expiry timestamp to dynamically inject external scripts. The script uses an IIFE with encoded CDN endpoints ('d3d3LmNkbjRhZHMuY29tL0Qvb3NpZ21hLm1pbi5qcw==' decoding to 'www.cdn4ads.com/D/osigma.min.js' and a CloudFront CSS URL), anti-freeze logic, and fallback loading — a common pattern for concealing malicious or unwanted ad payload delivery. (location: page.html:113)

high

malicious redirect

The obfuscated popunder script (page.html:113) uses siteId computed as 609+411*872-67+4724228=362538 with popunder configuration, dynamically loading scripts from www.cdn4ads.com and a CloudFront endpoint. Popunder ad networks are routinely exploited to redirect users to phishing pages, tech-support scams, or malware distribution sites without user consent. (location: page.html:113)

medium

social engineering

Navigation menu link 'Desi Kahani' points to external domain https://www.indiansexkahani.com/ without disclosure, silently routing users off-site. Cross-site navigation via embedded menu items to undisclosed affiliate or partner sites is a common social engineering vector on adult content platforms. (location: page.html:130)

medium

social engineering

Prominent animated gradient banner 'KaamDesi - Free Desi Porn Videos' links to external domain https://kaamdesi.com/ styled to appear as site-native content, designed to lure clicks to an undisclosed third-party site. No affiliate disclosure or external-link indicator is present. (location: page.html:179)

low

hidden content

A Webmaster affiliate/recruitment link in the footer uses visually styled inline CSS to make it appear as a button/badge, obfuscating its nature as a webmaster program recruitment link. This is a common technique on adult sites to recruit traffic resellers without clear disclosure. (location: page.html:1085)

low

hidden content

Third-party visitor counter script loaded from //widget.supercounters.com/ssl/online_t.js tracks user presence and exposes visit data to an external analytics provider without user consent notice, operating as a silent tracking beacon. (location: page.html:1090)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/fsiblog.cc

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is fsiblog.cc safe for AI agents to use?

fsiblog.cc currently scores 45/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.