Is frontol.ru safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
42/100

context safety score

A score of 42/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
80
content
10
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

malicious redirect

Page immediately redirects the visitor via window.location.href after a 1-second setTimeout. The destination URL is constructed dynamically from document.referrer and cookie values (__js_p_), making the final redirect target opaque and controllable server-side by setting the __js_p_ cookie. This is a classic cloaking/traffic-distribution system (TDS) pattern used to send bots and crawlers to a benign page while redirecting real users to malicious destinations. (location: page.html:36-48 (setTimeout redirect block))

high

obfuscated code

The get_jhash() function performs a computationally expensive loop (1,677,696 iterations) producing a hash value written to a cookie (__jhash_). This hash is likely used server-side as a bot/human proof-of-work challenge token. Combined with the user-agent fingerprinting cookie (__jua_), this forms a fingerprinting and evasion system designed to distinguish automated scanners from real browsers before delivering a payload or redirect. (location: page.html:7 (get_jhash function), page.html:40-43 (cookie-setting block))

medium

hidden content

The page renders no visible content to the user — only a centered 66x66 pixel animated GIF (ajaxload spinner embedded as a base64 data URI) is displayed. All functional logic is hidden inside JavaScript. The meta robots tag 'noindex, noarchive' instructs search engines not to index or cache the page, which is consistent with hiding malicious or transient content from archival and scanning systems. (location: page.html:1 (meta robots noindex/noarchive), page.html:2 (blank spinner image))

medium

social engineering

The loading spinner (ajaxload.info animated GIF) creates the false impression that a legitimate page is loading, keeping the visitor on the page for the 1-second delay before the redirect fires. This deceives the user into waiting rather than navigating away, facilitating the redirect chain. (location: page.html:2 (base64 ajaxload spinner div))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/frontol.ru

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is frontol.ru safe for AI agents to use?

frontol.ru currently scores 42/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.