context safety score
A score of 34/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
malicious redirect
A script is dynamically loaded at runtime from rex20263.cc via document.write, an unrelated third-party domain. This pattern is used to inject malicious or cloaked JavaScript after page load, bypassing static analysis. The cache-busting timestamp parameter (Date.now()) prevents caching and ensures the payload is always freshly fetched. (location: page.html:11 — document.write('<script src="https://rex20263.cc/media/res.js?v=' + Date.now() + '">...'))
social engineering
The site is a Vietnamese-language gambling affiliate hub masquerading as a legitimate review/ranking site ('Top 10 trusted bookmakers'). It uses trust-building language ('licensed', 'secure', 'expert-rated') and urgency signals ('register now, receive 88K bonus') to lure users into registering on offshore gambling platforms. The domain is only 17 days old, consistent with short-lived affiliate fraud infrastructure. (location: page-text.txt:1, metadata.json — domain_age_days: 17)
brand impersonation
The page references and promotes multiple branded gambling platforms (188bet, GO99, HITCLUB, IWINCLUB, MANCLUB, 555win, MU88, JBO, 79King44, XOSO66, Vswin10) by name, framing affiliate links as official registration/login portals ('Link đăng ký đăng nhập chính chủ' means 'Official registration/login link'). This impersonates these brands' official channels to harvest referral traffic and potentially credentials. (location: page.html:1 — title and meta description; page-text.txt:1)
malicious redirect
The hreflang alternate tag points to hechizosecreto.com (a completely different domain) for the vi-VN locale, indicating cross-domain traffic redirection infrastructure. Users or crawlers following this canonical signal may be sent to an unrelated third-party site. (location: page.html:3 — <link rel="alternate" hreflang="vi-VN" href="https://hechizosecreto.com/vi-vn/"/>)
social engineering
The meta description and page content promise a cash reward ('nhận thưởng hấp dẫn đến 88K khi đăng ký tại grovehillal.com') to incentivize user registration, a classic social engineering lure used to harvest personal and financial information on gambling/fraud sites. (location: page.html:1 — meta name="description" and meta name="twitter:description")
hidden content
A block of link-farm anchor tags is injected inside a div with font-size 10px (nearly invisible to users) containing links to multiple external domains (voltione.com, denno-times.com, dfwsmarttaxi.com, soniaproaia.com, rekartmotors.com, bereketduasi.com) labeled with gambling-related anchor text. This is hidden link-farm content used for SEO manipulation and traffic laundering, commented with 'youlian' (Chinese for 'friend links'). (location: page.html:11 — <div style="font-size: 10px;..."><!--youlian-->...)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/finedayvilla.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
finedayvilla.com currently scores 34/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.