Is fastpic.ru safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
46/100

context safety score

A score of 46/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
35
content
38
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

medium

hidden content

Browser fingerprinting script using FingerprintJS silently collects a unique visitor ID and stores it in a cookie (fp_fpid) and submits it as a hidden form field (fpId). This enables persistent cross-session tracking without user disclosure. (location: page.html:371-388, hidden input name='fp' id='fpId' at line 370)

low

hidden content

LiveInternet analytics counter image is initially hidden (display:none) and its src is dynamically set via JavaScript to transmit referrer, screen dimensions, color depth, page URL, and page title to counter.yadro.ru — a Russian analytics service. Data exfiltration occurs invisibly to the user. (location: page.html:436-463)

low

social engineering

Third-party push notification script dynamically injected from cdn.speraspace.com with encoded parameters (htext is base64: 'Разрешите, чтобы скачать' — 'Allow to download'). This pattern is commonly used to socially engineer users into granting browser push notification permissions under the guise of a download action. (location: page.html:478-486, src URL parameter htext=0KDQsNC30YDQtdGI0LjRgtC1LCDRh9GC0L7QsSDRgdC60LDRh9Cw0YLRjA%3D%3D)

low

malicious redirect

Third-party ad script loaded from jsc.adskeeper.co.uk (loaded twice, in both left and right ad panels). adskeeper is a known ad network that can serve malvertising and redirect users to unwanted or malicious destinations. The script is loaded async without integrity checks. (location: page.html:56, page.html:409)

low

hidden content

Pixel beacon loaded from u.fastpic.org/p/JCSXGetcs — an undocumented tracking endpoint on a subdomain. No visible attribution or disclosure, consistent with a silent tracking pixel pattern. (location: page.html:30)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/fastpic.ru

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is fastpic.ru safe for AI agents to use?

fastpic.ru currently scores 46/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.