Is experiencias.mesa247.co safe?

cautionmedium confidence
58/100

context safety score

A score of 58/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
50
behavior
80
content
54
graph
78

5 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

credential harvesting

A JWT bearer token is hardcoded and written to localStorage via inline JavaScript on every page load: localStorage.setItem('expToken', '<JWT>'). The token encodes sub:48496 with an expiry of 1806067938 (approx. 1 year from issuance) and is subsequently read back and injected as an Authorization header in all API calls to mesa-backend-prod. Any script on the page (including third-party trackers) can read localStorage and exfiltrate this token. (location: page.html:423 / page-text.txt:347)

medium

credential harvesting

The JWT token stored in localStorage is directly retrieved and inserted as a Bearer token in axios Authorization headers for API calls (ecommerce and banners endpoints). This pattern exposes the credential to XSS attacks and to all JavaScript executing on the page, including Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager scripts. (location: page.html:1070 / page-text.txt:1070)

low

hidden content

Google Tag Manager noscript iframe is rendered with style='display:none;visibility:hidden', making it invisible to users. While GTM itself is common, the hidden iframe executes tracking in a non-transparent manner and could be abused to load additional payloads if the GTM container (GTM-MBCZVRV2) were compromised. (location: page.html:76-78)

low

social engineering

Footer links under 'Acerca de MESA 24/7' and 'Más información' all point to mesa247.pe (Peru domain) while the page is served from experiencias.mesa247.co (Colombia domain). This domain mismatch could confuse users about which entity they are interacting with and may indicate an inconsistently maintained clone of a Peru-origin site deployed to a 65-day-old Colombia subdomain. (location: page.html:232-244)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/experiencias.mesa247.co

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is experiencias.mesa247.co safe for AI agents to use?

experiencias.mesa247.co currently scores 58/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 26, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.