Is eu-ffast.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
21/100

context safety score

A score of 21/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
5
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

high

phishing

Domain 'eu-ffast.com' uses a pattern consistent with phishing infrastructure: a geographic prefix ('eu-') combined with a misspelled or coined fast-payment/service term ('ffast'), a common technique to impersonate legitimate EU financial or courier services while evading exact-match detection. (location: metadata.json: domain=eu-ffast.com)

high

brand impersonation

The domain 'eu-ffast.com' likely impersonates EU-branded fast payment, logistics, or financial services (e.g., EU fast parcel delivery, EU fast transfer). The 'eu-' prefix falsely implies official European Union or EU-region branding, and 'ffast' is a deliberate misspelling to bypass brand monitoring. (location: metadata.json: domain=eu-ffast.com)

critical

phishing

TLS is not connected and certificate is invalid (connected=false, cert_valid=false, san_match=false). A site soliciting user interaction without valid TLS is a strong indicator of a phishing or credential-harvesting page that cannot or does not need to secure a legitimate session. (location: metadata.json: tls.connected=false, tls.cert_valid=false)

high

credential harvesting

Combination of suspicious domain pattern, invalid TLS, and unknown hosting reputation with no blocklist entry (suggesting a newly operational or evasive site) is consistent with credential harvesting infrastructure that has not yet been reported/flagged. (location: metadata.json: tls, hosting.reputation=Unknown, blocklist.listed=false)

medium

hidden content

Page HTML, visible text, and hidden text files are all empty despite the domain being reachable enough to have been scanned. This may indicate cloaking behavior: serving content only to targeted victims or specific user-agents/IPs while presenting a blank page to crawlers and security scanners. (location: page.html (empty), page-text.txt (empty), page-hidden.txt (empty))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/eu-ffast.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is eu-ffast.com safe for AI agents to use?

eu-ffast.com currently scores 21/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.