Is esther-be.muzce.com safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
46/100

context safety score

A score of 46/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
50
behavior
80
content
31
graph
62

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

medium

social engineering

Site operates as a music streaming/download portal offering copyrighted ZZ Top tracks ('бесплатно и без регистрации' — free and without registration), enticing users to download MP3 files. This is a common lure used to drive traffic to ad-heavy or potentially malicious download pages. (location: page.html:183, page-text.txt:139)

low

hidden content

LiveInternet tracking pixel is loaded via a base64-encoded blank GIF () and then dynamically replaced with a remote tracking URL via inline JavaScript. This invisibly exfiltrates the page URL, referrer, screen dimensions, and page title to counter.yadro.ru without user awareness. (location: page.html:342-349)

medium

hidden content

External script loaded from a third-party domain 'ru.viadata.store' (https://ru.viadata.store/v2/comm_min.js?sid=109170) with async attribute. This domain is unrelated to the site's primary domain (muzce.com) and the script purpose is opaque — consistent with ad injection, data harvesting, or browser fingerprinting scripts embedded invisibly on the page. (location: page.html:377)

low

hidden content

Yandex Metrika tracking with webvisor:true and clickmap:true enabled, recording full user interaction including mouse movements and clicks, sent to mc.yandex.ru. Combined with the yadro.ru pixel, multiple overlapping trackers silently collect behavioral data. (location: page.html:22-27)

low

brand impersonation

The subdomain esther-be.muzce.com is structured to appear as a dedicated artist page, mimicking a legitimate music distribution site. The site uses Warner Bros. Records track metadata and ZZ Top branding without authorization, creating a false impression of official content. (location: page.html:5, page.html:319-324)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/esther-be.muzce.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is esther-be.muzce.com safe for AI agents to use?

esther-be.muzce.com currently scores 46/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 26, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.