Is eromecdn.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
44/100

context safety score

A score of 44/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
5
behavior
100
content
50
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

medium

social engineering

Domain 'eromecdn.com' is only 36 days old (extremely new). Newly registered domains mimicking CDN infrastructure ('cdn' suffix) are a common pattern for malicious actors setting up short-lived infrastructure for phishing, malware distribution, or credential harvesting campaigns before being taken down. (location: metadata.json: whois.domain_age_days=36, domain=eromecdn.com)

medium

brand impersonation

The domain 'eromecdn.com' appends 'cdn' to suggest it is a content delivery network or legitimate infrastructure provider. This naming pattern is commonly used to impersonate or piggyback on the reputation of CDN services, potentially deceiving users or automated systems into trusting the domain. (location: metadata.json: domain=eromecdn.com)

high

hidden content

TLS connection failed entirely (connected=false, cert_valid=false, san_match=false) for an HTTPS URL. The page HTML and visible text are both empty, meaning no content was retrievable. A domain that serves no content over HTTPS but exists may be in a pre-activation or covert operational phase — used for tracking pixels, redirect chaining, or as a command-and-control staging domain not yet indexed or monitored. (location: metadata.json: tls.connected=false, tls.cert_valid=false; page.html (empty); page-text.txt (empty))

medium

malicious redirect

The combination of a very new domain (36 days), a CDN-style name, no TLS, and no visible content is consistent with a redirect or pass-through infrastructure node. Such domains are frequently used as intermediate hops in redirect chains to obscure the final malicious destination from URL scanners and reputation systems. (location: metadata.json: domain=eromecdn.com, domain_age_days=36, tls.connected=false)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/eromecdn.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is eromecdn.com safe for AI agents to use?

eromecdn.com currently scores 44/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.