Is era-cold-song.hydr0.org safe?

cautionmedium confidence
65/100

context safety score

A score of 65/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
90
behavior
60
content
54
graph
77

4 threat patterns detected

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

medium

brand impersonation

The page is served from era-cold-song.hydr0.org but displays MP3.cc branding throughout, including the page title ('Download mp3 free, listen music online - MP3.cc'), the logo, and footer copyright ('© 2017–2026 MP3.cc'). All navigation links and canonical tags point to mp3.cc. The site loads CSS and JS assets directly from mp3.cc. This is a hydr0.org-operated mirror that presents itself as the legitimate MP3.cc service, confusing users about which site they are actually using. (location: page.html:5 (title), page.html:9 (canonical), page.html:18-19 (asset loading), page.html:557 (footer copyright))

low

malicious redirect

The page includes a canonical link redirecting to https://mp3.cc/t/1986312064-era-cold-song/ from the actual serving domain era-cold-song.hydr0.org. This canonical redirect combined with all navigation links pointing to mp3.cc means any user or search engine following canonical signals is silently redirected to a different domain than the one they are on. This matches the single redirect flagged in Tier 2 analysis. (location: page.html:9 (rel=canonical href='https://mp3.cc/t/1986312064-era-cold-song/'))

low

obfuscated code

All 17 media file play URLs are base64-encoded values stored in data-url attributes pointing to fine.sunproxy.net. The base64 decodes to binary/encrypted data rather than plain URLs, obscuring the actual media source and proxy routing. The 12 suspicious base64 blobs flagged in Tier 2 correspond to these encoded proxy URLs. While this may be a DRM or anti-hotlinking mechanism, the use of a third-party proxy domain (fine.sunproxy.net) with opaque encoded payloads is a notable obfuscation pattern. (location: page.html:228,247,266,285,304,323,342,361,380,399,418,437,456,475,494,513,532 (data-url attributes))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/era-cold-song.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is era-cold-song.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

era-cold-song.hydr0.org currently scores 65/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 26, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.