Is dragonforce-x-brawl-stars.hydr0.org safe?

cautionmedium confidence
60/100

context safety score

A score of 60/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
92
behavior
60
content
44
graph
70

5 threat patterns detected

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

medium

malicious redirect

The page is served from dragonforce-x-brawl-stars.hydr0.org but the canonical URL, all internal links, assets (CSS/JS), and branding point entirely to mp3.cc. The subdomain hydr0.org acts as a redirect/proxy layer that delivers mp3.cc content under a different domain, constituting a deceptive redirect/cloaking arrangement. The pre-scan context also confirms 1 redirect was detected. (location: page.html:9 - canonical tag href='https://mp3.cc/t/1808681414-dragonforce-x-brawl-stars/'; page served from hydr0.org)

medium

brand impersonation

The site at hydr0.org reproduces the full MP3.cc brand identity—logo, CSS, JS, navigation, footer copyright '© 2017–2026 MP3.cc', and contact email hydrofm@yandex.com—without being the legitimate mp3.cc domain. This constitutes impersonation or unauthorized mirroring of the MP3.cc brand and service. (location: page.html:5,614 - title and footer copyright; all assets loaded from mp3.cc)

low

malicious redirect

All MP3 audio file play links route through fine.sunproxy.net, a third-party proxy/CDN domain unrelated to either hydr0.org or mp3.cc. Audio traffic is redirected through this intermediary, which could facilitate traffic interception, tracking, or malware delivery via tainted media files. (location: page.html:228,247,266,285,304,323,342,361,380,399,418,437,456,475,494,513,532,551,570,589 - data-url attributes pointing to fine.sunproxy.net)

low

hidden content

The page contains 12 suspicious base64 blobs as flagged by pre-scan heuristics. These are present in the data-url attributes of playlist items and encode opaque file paths served via fine.sunproxy.net. While they decode to MP3 file path strings, the obfuscation prevents transparent inspection of actual file destinations. (location: page.html:228,247,266 et al. - base64-encoded strings in data-url attributes of playlist-play anchors)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/dragonforce-x-brawl-stars.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is dragonforce-x-brawl-stars.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

dragonforce-x-brawl-stars.hydr0.org currently scores 60/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 26, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.