Is doujindesu.tv safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
26/100

context safety score

A score of 26/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
50
content
0
graph
30

11 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

obfuscated code

Two identical large obfuscated JavaScript blocks using URI-encoded string decoding, character rotation cipher (Vigenere-style modular arithmetic on charCodes), and index-based string slicing to hide the actual payload. The script loads external ad network scripts (frozenpayerpregnant.com, footbathmockerpurse.com) whose URLs are constructed at runtime, preventing static analysis of destinations. (location: page.html lines 39-43, <script data-cfasync='false'> blocks before the ad network script tags)

high

malicious redirect

Third-party ad scripts loaded from suspicious domains 'frozenpayerpregnant.com' (in.js) and 'footbathmockerpurse.com' (on.js) with onerror/onload callbacks tied to obfuscated handler functions. These domains have no legitimate brand association and use nonsensical names typical of malvertising networks known to serve drive-by redirects and unwanted pop-unders. (location: page.html line 40: //frozenpayerpregnant.com/in.js; line 43: //footbathmockerpurse.com/on.js)

medium

malicious redirect

Domain redirect script checks window.location.hostname and forces a redirect to doujindesu.tv if any other domain is detected. This pattern is used by sites that maintain multiple domains (including fake/clone sites) to funnel traffic through a single controlled domain, and can be abused on impersonating clones to silently redirect visitors. (location: page.html lines 352-357, inline <script> block)

medium

social engineering

Site prominently displays warnings about fake phishing clones of itself ('Hati-hati terhadap Website Palsu, sudah banyak Korban Phising dari Website Palsu') while simultaneously operating under two distinct domains (doujindesu.tv and doujindesu.XXX). This dual-domain operation and self-referential phishing warning is a social engineering pattern used to establish false trust and direct users away from legitimate alternatives. (location: page.html lines 502-503, announcement section; page-text.txt lines 143-144)

medium

malicious redirect

Link shortener and redirect intermediaries used extensively for ad banners: klik.best, klik.top, gacor.zone, gacor.vin, linkol.xyz, aksesin.top, dw.zeus.fun, goid.space, cek.to, menujupenta.site, kegz.site, goratu.site, bergurukecina.fun. These redirect chains obscure the final destination from users and security tools, and are associated with Indonesian online gambling affiliate networks. (location: page.html lines 506-519, 895-908, ad banner <a> href attributes throughout)

medium

social engineering

Numerous gambling site advertisements (SBOBET, KOKO88, INDO666, BANDAR36, PENTASLOT, JPDEWA, GAZA88, CHINA777, RATU89, HokiDewa, IBO, IDKS, dewacuan, Suroso88, KDSLOT, SBOBETMAIN) are embedded in banner ads targeting an adult content audience. Several lead to /login pages on unvetted domains designed to harvest user credentials for gambling platforms, combining credential harvesting risk with social engineering toward vulnerable populations. (location: page.html lines 506-519, 894-909, 1266-1281, footer nav lines 1352-1354)

medium

credential harvesting

Multiple ad banners link directly to /login endpoints on third-party domains (goid.space/login, menujupenta.site/login, kegz.site/login, goratu.site/login) for gambling sites with no brand recognition. These login pages are unaffiliated with any established operator and may be designed to harvest credentials under the guise of gambling site registration. (location: page.html lines 513, 515, 517, 519 — href values pointing to /login on unvetted domains)

low

hidden content

A Histats tracking pixel (sstatic1.histats.com/0.gif) is embedded inside an anchor tag with empty alt text and no visible label, functioning as a hidden user tracking beacon. Additionally, an ouo.io full-page script is loaded which is a known URL monetization/redirect service that can intercept outbound link clicks and route them through ad intermediaries. (location: page.html lines 1334-1343: Histats pixel comment block and //cdn.ouo.io/js/full-page-script.js script tag)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/doujindesu.tv

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is doujindesu.tv safe for AI agents to use?

doujindesu.tv currently scores 26/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.