context safety score
A score of 46/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
tls connection failed
Could not establish TLS connection
brand impersonation
Domain name 'digitalcertvalidation.com' impersonates legitimate certificate authority or SSL/TLS validation services by combining official-sounding terms ('digital', 'cert', 'validation'). This pattern is commonly used to deceive users and automated agents into trusting the domain as an authoritative security credential source. (location: metadata.json: domain field)
phishing
The domain 'digitalcertvalidation.com' presents itself as a digital certificate validation authority but fails TLS validation entirely (connected=false, cert_valid=false, san_match=false). A site claiming to validate digital certificates that itself cannot establish a valid TLS connection is a strong phishing indicator — the domain name is used to build false trust while the infrastructure is not legitimate. (location: metadata.json: tls object)
credential harvesting
The combination of a certificate/validation-themed domain name with no valid TLS and no page content is consistent with a credential harvesting lure — the domain may be used in emails or redirects to collect credentials under the guise of a security verification step. (location: metadata.json: domain, tls fields)
malicious redirect
The site returns no page content (page.html and page-text.txt are empty) despite the domain being reachable enough to be scanned. This blank-page pattern is consistent with a redirect or cloaking setup where content is only served to targeted victims or after a redirect chain, obscuring the true malicious payload from scanners. (location: page.html, page-text.txt: empty content)
hidden content
page-hidden.txt is empty and page.html contains no content, yet the domain resolves and was submitted for scanning. The absence of any rendered or hidden content may indicate server-side cloaking — serving different content based on user-agent, IP, or referrer — a technique used to evade automated threat detection while delivering malicious content to real users. (location: page-hidden.txt, page.html: empty)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/digitalcertvalidation.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
digitalcertvalidation.com currently scores 46/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.