Is desikahani2.net safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
33/100

context safety score

A score of 33/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
30
content
0
graph
70

17 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

medium

cloaking

Page checks user-agent for bot/crawler strings to serve different content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

cloaking

Page loads content in transparent or zero-size iframe overlay

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

malicious redirect

Back-button hijacking script: pushes 10 history states and triggers location.replace() to 'https://backbutton.videobaba.xyz/back-button-script/public/getit.php?site=DK' when user presses back. This traps users and forces them to an external ad/redirect domain. (location: page.html:93-109)

medium

hidden content

Element '#mhead' is set to 'display:none' in CSS (page.html:166) but is dynamically populated via JavaScript with an ad iframe from blazingserver.net. The iframe is injected invisibly into a hidden container, concealing third-party content from visible inspection. (location: page.html:166, page.html:1067-1078)

high

hidden content

Client-hint metadata delegation to 'tsyndicate.com' via 'delegate-ch' meta tag, sharing detailed browser/device fingerprinting data (sec-ch-ua, platform, architecture, model, full-version-list, mobile status) with a third-party domain without user awareness. (location: page.html:111)

medium

malicious redirect

Navigation menu link labeled 'Indian Live Sex' routes through 'blazingserver.net/revive/www/admin/plugins/redirectAd/redirect.php?zoneid=329' — a third-party redirect ad server that obscures the true destination from users and AI agents browsing links. (location: page.html:317, page.html:333, page.html:359)

medium

social engineering

Navigation menu item labeled 'AI Porn video' links to 'https://wumtel.online?union_id=MTg3' and another item 'AI Porn Video' links to 'https://www.cmonbae.com/?union_id=MTg3', both using 'AI' branding to entice AI-assisted browsing agents or users seeking AI-related content into clicking affiliate/adult links. (location: page.html:319, page.html:358)

medium

obfuscated code

Custom inline base64 encode/decode functions (b2a, a2b, b64e, b64d) are defined and used throughout the page to obfuscate ad injection payloads. Ad content stored in 'data-code' attributes is base64-encoded and decoded at runtime before DOM insertion, hiding the actual ad payloads from static analysis. (location: page.html:1122-1125)

low

hidden content

Sidebar widget injects an iframe from 'https://a.videobaba.xyz/OX/DK/d-dk.php?spot=VDOA' — a third-party ad/tracking domain — embedded inline in the page without clear disclosure to users. (location: page.html:692)

high

hidden content

A script from 'https://js.streampsh.top/ps/ps.js?id=6FYyMMyMqESAdTqTmwQQxg' is loaded deferred at the bottom of the page. The domain 'streampsh.top' is an opaque third-party with no visible brand attribution on the page, consistent with covert tracking or push notification subscription scripts. (location: page.html:1062)

medium

malicious redirect

Analytics/tracking script loaded from 'https://stats.indianpornempire.com/js/script.js' — a cross-site tracker embedded on the page that silently profiles visitors on behalf of a third-party network (IPE/Indian Porn Empire) without prominent disclosure. (location: page.html:85)

low

social engineering

Age verification gate (ageverif.com) is bypassed on error: 'window.ageverifError = loadAds' loads ads regardless of verification failure, meaning the age gate provides no real protection and is used solely as a pretext to delay ad loading rather than enforce age restrictions. (location: page.html:146-152)

low

hidden content

PHP source code fragment leaked in rendered HTML output (lines 1015-1027): '<?\n\n\t\techo $args[\'after_widget\'];\n\t}\n\n// Widget Backend...' — server-side template code exposed in the page source, revealing internal widget/plugin structure. (location: page.html:1015-1027)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/desikahani2.net

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is desikahani2.net safe for AI agents to use?

desikahani2.net currently scores 33/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.