Is cryptoinsights.site safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
44/100

context safety score

A score of 44/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
80
content
10
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

malicious redirect

Session storage-based redirect: script reads 'xl' key from sessionStorage and immediately redirects the browser to that URL (window.location.href=window.sessionStorage.getItem("xl")). This allows any previously set sessionStorage value—potentially planted by a malicious ad or cross-site script—to silently redirect users to an arbitrary external URL without user interaction. (location: page.html:129)

high

prompt injection

CleverWebServer ad script (CleverCoreLoader98531) dynamically injects an external script from scripts.cleverwebserver.com with unchecked data-callback attributes set to placeholder strings ('put-your-callback-function-here', 'put-your-click-macro-here', 'put-your-view-macro-here'). This pattern is used by ad networks to inject arbitrary JavaScript payloads at runtime, which could include prompt injection content targeting AI agents crawling or rendering the page. (location: page.html:144-169)

high

malicious redirect

Popunder ad network script loaded from //acscdn.com/script/aclib.js with aclib.runPop({zoneId:'9008714'}) invoked immediately. The acscdn.com domain is associated with aggressive popunder/redirect advertising networks known to push users to scam, phishing, and malware distribution pages. (location: page.html:587-592)

medium

hidden content

Footer logo image is sourced from an external unrelated domain: https://discover.digicribe.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo.png — a different site (digicribe.in) rather than cryptoinsights.site. This cross-domain asset could be used to track visitors, exfiltrate referrer data, or be swapped for malicious content without detection. (location: page.html:472)

medium

social engineering

Site promotes crypto investment content including 'Best Ways to Earn Free Crypto in 2025 (Airdrops + Tasks)' and 'Best Stablecoins to Save & Earn Passive Income', which are classic lure topics used in crypto scam funnels to attract users seeking quick financial gains, potentially routing them via ad networks to credential-harvesting or investment fraud pages. (location: page.html:289, page-text.txt:147)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/cryptoinsights.site

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is cryptoinsights.site safe for AI agents to use?

cryptoinsights.site currently scores 44/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.