Is crummydevioussucculent.com safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
45/100

context safety score

A score of 45/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
80
behavior
100
content
17
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

brand impersonation

The domain crummydevioussucculent.com hosts a page that fully impersonates Clickadu s.r.o.'s official privacy policy, using the Clickadu logo (embedded as a base64 SVG), Clickadu branding, company address, and Tax ID. The page is titled 'Operated by Clickadu Advertisement Network' but is served from an unrelated third-party domain, not clickadu.com. (location: page.html:4, page.html:153-155, page.html:159)

high

social engineering

The page poses as a legitimate privacy/unsubscribe portal for Clickadu push notification subscribers. It provides detailed instructions for managing browser push notification subscriptions, likely used to lure users who received unwanted push notifications into interacting with this third-party-controlled page rather than the legitimate Clickadu domain. (location: page.html:181-253, page-text.txt:31-103)

medium

prompt injection

The page contains a hidden collapsible section (CSS class 'collapse' with 'display:none' by default) containing detailed browser notification manipulation instructions. This hidden content could be used to inject instructions into AI agents crawling/summarizing the page, directing them to guide users through disabling security notifications or manipulating browser settings. (location: page.html:186-253 (id='collapseContainer', class='collapse'))

medium

hidden content

A collapsible div with id='collapseContainer' and class='collapse' is hidden by default via CSS (display:none). It contains step-by-step browser notification manipulation instructions that are not visible to users on page load but are present in the DOM and accessible to crawlers and AI agents. (location: page.html:186, page.html:87-89 (.collapse:not(.show) { display: none; }))

medium

malicious redirect

The unsubscribe button silently POSTs a JSON payload to '/unsubscribe' on the same domain (crummydevioussucculent.com), a domain unrelated to Clickadu. This intercepts user unsubscribe requests that users believe are going to Clickadu, potentially harvesting subscription/device identifiers or confirming active users to the ad network operator. (location: page.html:330-364 (xhr.open POST /unsubscribe))

low

credential harvesting

The /unsubscribe endpoint receives a POST request with a JSON body containing a timestamp. While minimal, this interaction with an unaffiliated domain under the guise of an official Clickadu privacy page could be used to fingerprint and track users, or to silently collect browser/device metadata sent by the XHR request (cookies, headers). (location: page.html:364 (xhr.send JSON.stringify({ ts: Date.now() })))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/crummydevioussucculent.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is crummydevioussucculent.com safe for AI agents to use?

crummydevioussucculent.com currently scores 45/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.