context safety score
A score of 50/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.
phishing
1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host
brand impersonation
The site operates on a third-party domain (coreldraw-graphics-suite.cn.softmany.com) while presenting itself as an official CorelDRAW download page, impersonating Corel Corporation. The structured data explicitly lists 'author': {'name': 'Corel Corporation', 'url': 'https://www.corel.com/en/'} and the og:site_name is 'Softmany.com', creating deliberate confusion between the legitimate vendor and this third-party distributor. (location: page.html:63-76, metadata.json)
social engineering
The page falsely describes CorelDRAW Graphics Suite (a commercial product priced at ~$499/year) as 'free' with a 'shareware license' and 'price: 0 USD' in structured data. This misrepresentation is designed to lure users into downloading what may be an unlicensed, cracked, or trojanized copy of the software. (location: page.html:79-80, page-text.txt:314)
phishing
The download button links to /windows/download on the same third-party domain rather than the official corel.com download. Users believing they are on an official or legitimate site may download malicious or pirated software. The listed file size of 3.40 MB is implausibly small for CorelDRAW Graphics Suite (the legitimate installer is several GB), indicating the download is not the real software. (location: page.html:503-509, page-text.txt:253)
credential harvesting
A POST form exists targeting /rate-content on the same domain, submitting a CSRF token and content interaction data. While nominally a rating form, the CSRF token (YEForfY5yoPGpgHb5PY9Q1eBzypxkJ2qrkuNrPe7) is exposed in both the HTML meta tag and inline JavaScript fetch calls, and the form submission infrastructure could be repurposed or augmented to harvest user-identifying data on the server side. (location: page.html:34, 447-450, 796-804)
hidden content
The footer contains 15 empty <p> elements inside col-auto divs with no visible text or links. While the hidden content ratio is low (0.01), these empty containers may be placeholders for dynamically injected content or link spam that is conditionally rendered server-side or via JavaScript after page load. (location: page.html:685-744)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/coreldraw-graphics-suite.cn.softmany.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
coreldraw-graphics-suite.cn.softmany.com currently scores 50/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.