Is click-exchange.ovh safe?

cautionmedium confidence
70/100

context safety score

A score of 70/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
90
behavior
80
content
57
graph
73

5 threat patterns detected

high

hidden content

1 hidden or tiny iframe elements detected

high

malicious redirect

JavaScript on window.onload intercepts ALL anchor clicks and redirects the user to 'https://referencement.faciles.ovh/popunder/random_marketing.php' after opening the intended link in a new tab. This is a popunder/redirect hijack that fires once per hour per browser session via localStorage timestamp gating. Users clicking any link are silently redirected to an off-domain marketing URL. (location: page.html:35 — inline <script> in <header>)

medium

hidden content

An iframe loads content from 'https://referencement.faciles.ovh/468.php?sma=598&bob=24716&bag=1&mba=6&cry=1417&eba=soniaban3&deta=4' with style 'background-color: blue; overflow:hidden; border:0px' and scrolling disabled. The iframe is inside a column with class 'd_none' (display:none), making it invisible to users. It silently loads third-party content with tracking parameters from the same off-domain operator behind the redirect script. (location: page.html:89 — <iframe> inside div.d_none)

low

social engineering

The site uses animated blinking CSS effects (classes 'clignote' and 'clignote1') on banner links to draw attention to affiliate traffic exchange sites, designed to encourage clicks to external referral URLs with affiliate/referral IDs embedded (e.g., ?rid=605, ?rid=374, ?ref=3). These are deceptive attention-manipulation techniques common in low-quality traffic exchange schemes. (location: page.html:210-226, 228-234 — inline <style> and affiliate banner links)

medium

malicious redirect

The same off-domain operator (referencement.faciles.ovh / faciles.ovh) controls both the popunder redirect script and the hidden iframe, and is also linked in the footer as 'Top Click Exchange'. This establishes a coordinated traffic hijacking infrastructure where user clicks across the site are intercepted and routed through the operator's marketing pipeline. (location: page.html:290 — footer link to referencement.faciles.ovh/click_ex.php; page.html:35 and page.html:89 — script and iframe)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/click-exchange.ovh

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is click-exchange.ovh safe for AI agents to use?

click-exchange.ovh currently scores 70/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.