Is ceouttarpradesh.nic.in safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
47/100

context safety score

A score of 47/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
20
behavior
100
content
50
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

medium

phishing

The site ceouttarpradesh.nic.in failed TLS connection (connected=false, cert_valid=false, san_match=false). A government domain (nic.in is India's National Informatics Centre) that cannot establish a valid TLS session is highly anomalous — legitimate government portals maintain valid certificates. This may indicate a spoofed or compromised domain targeting citizens expecting a trusted government site. (location: metadata.json: tls fields)

high

brand impersonation

The domain ceouttarpradesh.nic.in uses the nic.in subdomain structure associated with official Indian government infrastructure (National Informatics Centre). However, TLS validation completely fails (connected=false, cert_valid=false, issuer=null), which is inconsistent with any legitimate nic.in property. This pattern is consistent with brand impersonation of Indian government election/voter services (CEO = Chief Electoral Officer, Uttar Pradesh). (location: metadata.json: domain, tls)

medium

hidden content

The page.html, page-text.txt, and page-hidden.txt files are all completely empty despite the domain resolving and being scanned. This absence of content combined with TLS failure suggests the page may be serving no content intentionally (e.g., a parked impersonation domain, a redirect-only shell, or content withheld based on user-agent/IP to evade scanners). (location: page.html, page-text.txt, page-hidden.txt (all empty))

medium

malicious redirect

The combination of an empty page body and failed TLS on a government-branded domain suggests possible use as a redirect intermediary — serving no direct content to automated scanners while redirecting human visitors (browser-based) to phishing or credential harvesting pages targeting Indian voters or government service users. (location: page.html (empty body), metadata.json: tls.connected=false)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/ceouttarpradesh.nic.in

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is ceouttarpradesh.nic.in safe for AI agents to use?

ceouttarpradesh.nic.in currently scores 47/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.