Is buffooncountabletreble.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
41/100

context safety score

A score of 41/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
50
behavior
100
content
20
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

brand impersonation

The domain buffooncountabletreble.com hosts a page that fully impersonates Clickadu's official privacy policy, replicating Clickadu s.r.o. branding, logo (embedded as base64 SVG), corporate address, Tax ID, and privacy policy text verbatim. The domain is unrelated to clickadu.com, creating a deceptive facade of legitimacy for what is a push-notification spam/ad network operation. (location: page.html:4, page.html:153-155, page.html:299-301)

high

social engineering

The page is designed to appear as a legitimate Clickadu privacy/unsubscribe portal. It guides users through push notification subscription management while operating from a nonsense lookalike domain (buffooncountabletreble.com). The 'Unsubscribe' button POSTs to /unsubscribe on this third-party domain rather than clickadu.com, potentially harvesting device/browser fingerprint data or confirming active push notification subscriptions to the ad network operator. (location: page.html:272-277, page.html:330-364)

medium

credential harvesting

The 'Unsubscribe' button silently POSTs JSON data (including a timestamp) to /unsubscribe on the attacker-controlled domain buffooncountabletreble.com via XHR. While only {ts: Date.now()} is sent in the visible code, the endpoint on the rogue domain can correlate browser cookies, IP addresses, and push notification tokens to profile and confirm active subscribers for continued ad targeting or sale to third parties. (location: page.html:330-365)

medium

hidden content

The logo image is embedded as a large base64-encoded SVG data URI (data:image/svg+xml;base64,...) inline in the HTML rather than served from clickadu.com. This obfuscates the full content of the image from casual inspection and is consistent with techniques used to hide secondary payloads or tracking pixels within seemingly innocuous image data. (location: page.html:154)

medium

social engineering

The page presents a 'Subscription Management Guide' with step-by-step browser instructions ostensibly to help users unsubscribe from push notifications. This content is collapsed by default (hidden via CSS class 'collapse') and is only shown on user interaction, reducing scrutiny. The guide reinforces the legitimacy narrative while the real purpose of the domain is push-notification ad delivery infrastructure for Clickadu's network. (location: page.html:181-253, page.html:87-89)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/buffooncountabletreble.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is buffooncountabletreble.com safe for AI agents to use?

buffooncountabletreble.com currently scores 41/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.