Is bmr.artwhere.co safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
35/100

context safety score

A score of 35/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
55
content
0
graph
73

6 threat patterns detected

high

hidden instruction

high hidden content ratio detected in DOM

critical

brand impersonation

The scanned domain bmr.artwhere.co serves a full clone of the legitimate Bauer Media Régie website (bauermediapublicite.fr), impersonating the brand. The HTML canonical tag, all internal links, and CSS/JS assets point to bauermediapublicite.fr, while the serving domain is an unrelated third-party artwhere.co subdomain presenting itself as the official site. (location: page.html:line 113 (canonical), page.html:line 162 (logo href), page.html:line 1596 (footer copyright))

high

malicious redirect

A script tag loads JavaScript from a randomly-named subdomain and file: https://ffmdjvheyi.bauermediapublicite.fr/xojpndas.js. This pattern (random subdomain + random filename masquerading as a known brand domain) is a common technique for injecting malicious payloads or trackers into cloned/spoofed sites while appearing to originate from the legitimate domain. (location: page.html:line 9)

critical

phishing

The page at bmr.artwhere.co is a full replica of the Bauer Media Régie corporate site including a contact form (CF7), staff names, phone numbers, and branding. Users or automated agents visiting this URL would interact with a spoofed version of the legitimate site, enabling credential/data harvesting via the contact form and misleading visitors into believing they are on the official bauermediapublicite.fr site. (location: page.html:lines 1407-1430 (contact form), metadata.json:domain field)

medium

hidden content

The pre-scan detected a hidden content ratio of 1.00, meaning essentially all rendered content is hidden or lazy-loaded. All image src attributes use a 1x1 transparent SVG placeholder () with real content in data-src, making the actual linked resources (from artwhere.co subdomains) invisible to static scanners. This technique can conceal the true origin of loaded content. (location: page.html:lines 139, 145, 163, 237, 313 (lazyload img placeholders))

high

brand impersonation

A secondary artwhere.co subdomain (bauer.artwhere.co) is used to serve images including staff photos and theme assets. Together with bmr.artwhere.co, this reveals a coordinated network of subdomains under artwhere.co impersonating the Bauer Media brand family. (location: page.html:line 145 (bauer.artwhere.co/wp-content/themes/bauermedia/images/arrow.png), page.html:lines 1251, 1322, 1393 (staff photos from bmr.artwhere.co))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/bmr.artwhere.co

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is bmr.artwhere.co safe for AI agents to use?

bmr.artwhere.co currently scores 35/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.