Is blue-billie-eilish.muzce.com safe?

cautionmedium confidence
62/100

context safety score

A score of 62/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
50
behavior
100
content
54
graph
62

5 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

brand impersonation

The site operates on a subdomain 'blue-billie-eilish.muzce.com' engineered to rank for searches related to artist Billie Eilish. It uses the artist's name in the domain, page title, metadata, and structured data (schema.org MusicRecording) to impersonate an official or authorized music distribution platform. The site offers free MP3 downloads of copyrighted tracks attributed to Billie Eilish without authorization, exploiting the artist's brand identity. (location: domain: blue-billie-eilish.muzce.com; page title; meta keywords; schema.org JSON-LD structured data)

medium

social engineering

The page actively encourages users to download copyrighted MP3 files ('бесплатно и без регистрации' — free and without registration) using the artist's name and music catalog to lure users into downloading files from an untrusted third-party server (muzce.com/file/...). The obfuscated/tokenized file URLs prevent inspection of actual file contents prior to download, and files are served from a different domain than the site itself. (location: page.html lines 183-184; all data-track attributes pointing to https://muzce.com/file/)

low

hidden content

The Yandex Metrika noscript tracking pixel is positioned off-screen using 'position:absolute; left:-9999px;' — a standard technique for hiding tracking elements from visual display. While common for analytics, this is a known method for invisible user tracking without consent disclosure. (location: page.html line 28: <img src='https://mc.yandex.ru/watch/103572704' style='position:absolute; left:-9999px;'>)

low

hidden content

A LiveInternet/Yadro counter script is rendered inline in page-text.txt at the footer and dynamically sets the src of an element with id 'licntC87E', sending referrer, screen dimensions, color depth, URL, and page title to counter.yadro.ru — a Russian analytics/tracking service. This data exfiltration to a third-party tracking domain is embedded without visible disclosure to users. (location: page-text.txt lines 913-917)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/blue-billie-eilish.muzce.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is blue-billie-eilish.muzce.com safe for AI agents to use?

blue-billie-eilish.muzce.com currently scores 62/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.