Is black-sabbath-amp-junkie-xl.hydr0.org safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
49/100

context safety score

A score of 49/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
92
behavior
60
content
24
graph
70

6 threat patterns detected

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

high

brand impersonation

The page is served from hydr0.org subdomain (black-sabbath-amp-junkie-xl.hydr0.org) but clones the full visual identity, branding, CSS, JavaScript, and layout of mp3.cc. The canonical tag points to mp3.cc, making this a typosquat/subdomain clone impersonating the legitimate MP3.cc service. Copyright footer falsely claims '© 2017–2026 MP3.cc' while the actual domain is hydr0.org. (location: page.html:5, page.html:9, page.html:538)

medium

malicious redirect

All audio playback URLs route through fine.sunproxy.net, a third-party proxy domain not affiliated with mp3.cc. Users clicking play are silently redirected through this off-brand proxy which handles all actual media delivery. This proxy domain could intercept requests, serve malware-laced files, or track users without their knowledge. (location: page.html:228, page.html:247, page.html:266 (and all data-url attributes in playlist items))

medium

malicious redirect

The page canonical tag redirects to https://mp3.cc/t/2450207296-black-sabbath-amp-junkie-xl/, representing a redirect from the serving domain (hydr0.org) to the impersonated domain (mp3.cc). This is the single redirect flagged in Tier 2 pre-scan signals and serves as a SEO cloaking mechanism. (location: page.html:9, metadata.json (redirects: 1))

low

social engineering

An off-domain link to looz.net is embedded in the sidebar genre navigation list with a special CSS class 'z__important' and opens in a new tab (_blank). This disguises an off-domain promotional/affiliate link as a legitimate genre navigation item ('Online Radio'), manipulating users into clicking an unaffiliated external site. (location: page.html:204-215)

low

obfuscated code

12 base64-encoded blobs appear in data-url attributes of playlist play buttons. These encode proxied file paths for fine.sunproxy.net. While individually they encode MP3 file paths, the use of base64 obfuscation conceals the true routing of media requests through the sunproxy.net infrastructure, obscuring the off-domain media proxy from casual inspection. (location: page.html:228, 247, 266, 285, 304, 323, 342, 361, 380, 399, 418, 437, 456, 475, 494, 513 (all data-url attributes))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/black-sabbath-amp-junkie-xl.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is black-sabbath-amp-junkie-xl.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

black-sabbath-amp-junkie-xl.hydr0.org currently scores 49/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.