Is bhojpurisex.site safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
33/100

context safety score

A score of 33/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
30
content
0
graph
70

13 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

medium

cloaking

Page checks user-agent for bot/crawler strings to serve different content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

malicious redirect

JavaScript manipulates browser history by pushing 10 states via history.pushState() then hijacks the back button via onpopstate to force a redirect to https://backbutton.videobaba.xyz/back-button-script/public/getit.php?site=BSS. This traps users on the site and forces navigation to a third-party destination when the back button is pressed. (location: page.html:65 and page.html:1557-1568)

high

malicious redirect

Navigation menu contains a link labeled 'Indian Live Sex' and 'Live Girls' pointing to https://blazingserver.net/revive/www/admin/plugins/redirectAd/redirect.php?zoneid=197 and zoneid=362 — opaque ad-network redirect URLs that pass through a third-party ad server before reaching an unknown destination, concealing the final landing page from users and security tools. (location: page.html:243-244)

high

hidden content

The hero section (page.html:1503) contains a large injected block of Slack UI HTML markup (div.p-workspace__primary_view_body, c-virtual_list, c-message_list, etc.) embedded inside the visible page text. This Slack-interface HTML is invisible to normal users but visible to scrapers and AI agents reading page text, constituting hidden content injection likely intended to manipulate AI/crawler analysis or stage social-engineering content. (location: page.html:1503, page-text.txt:1176)

critical

prompt injection

The hero section embeds a full Slack-style conversation UI DOM structure inside the page body (data-qa attributes: message_container, block-kit-renderer, virtual-list-item, etc.). This is a known prompt injection pattern targeting AI agents that parse page content: injecting fake UI context (a Slack direct message thread) to manipulate agent behavior or data extraction. The content is truncated in the captured HTML but the structural scaffolding of a fabricated Slack DM conversation is present. (location: page.html:1503)

medium

hidden content

Third-party analytics script loaded from https://stats.indianpornempire.com/js/script.js via a defer tag with data-domain attribute. This exfiltrates browsing behavior to an external domain (indianpornempire.com) not disclosed in the site's privacy policy context visible on the page. (location: page.html:63)

medium

hidden content

The <meta http-equiv='delegate-ch'> header delegates multiple client-hint headers (sec-ch-ua, sec-ch-ua-bitness, sec-ch-ua-arch, sec-ch-ua-model, sec-ch-ua-platform, sec-ch-ua-platform-version, sec-ch-ua-full-version, sec-ch-ua-full-version-list, sec-ch-ua-mobile) to https://tsyndicate.com, silently sharing detailed browser/device fingerprinting data with a third-party ad syndication network without user awareness. (location: page.html:67)

medium

social engineering

Ad unit disguised as a content thumbnail is embedded in the video grid with fake view count (6548 views) and fake rating (96%) to make it appear as legitimate user-generated content, directing users to https://www.kamareels2.com. The ad is labeled 'AD' only in small metadata text while visually matching organic video blocks. (location: page.html:474-490)

medium

obfuscated code

The page contains inline JavaScript functions b2a() and a2b() implementing custom Base64 encode/decode routines alongside b64e and b64d wrappers. These are used by the ad insertion framework (ai_insert_code, ai_check_and_insert_block) to store and execute ad payload code via atob/btoa at runtime, obfuscating the actual ad content delivered dynamically from encoded data attributes. (location: page.html:1651-1653, page-text.txt:1324-1326)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/bhojpurisex.site

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is bhojpurisex.site safe for AI agents to use?

bhojpurisex.site currently scores 33/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.