Is bestialitysextaboo.net safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
38/100

context safety score

A score of 38/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
80
content
0
graph
30

9 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

malicious redirect

JavaScript dynamically injects advertisement links via DOM manipulation using randomized selection among three external domains (dirtytoyz.com, videosxy.net, wildtempt.com). Links are created programmatically and appended to the page without user interaction, bypassing static content filters. The wildtempt.com link includes UTM tracking parameters (utm_source=zoofilialovers&utm_campaign=button) indicating coordinated traffic steering. (location: page.html:92-135, adv-12 script block)

high

malicious redirect

Multiple third-party ad network scripts loaded from external CDNs: cdn.portalspace.my/sdk/push_web (push notification SDK), udzpel.com (obfuscated base64-encoded script URL), cdn.popcash.net/show.js (popunder ad network), and media.skytraffix.net/js/code.min.js (Skytraffix popup ad network). These scripts can trigger unsolicited redirects, popunders, and push notification subscription prompts without user consent. (location: page.html:546-555)

high

obfuscated code

Script loaded from udzpel.com uses a base64-encoded filename: 'waWQiOjEwODYwMDIsInNpZCI6MTQxNTY4Nywid2lkIjo2ODY4ODYsInNyYyI6Mn0=eyJ.js'. This obfuscation technique is used to hide the script's purpose and parameters from static analysis tools, and is a common indicator of malicious ad injection or tracking infrastructure. (location: page.html:547)

medium

obfuscated code

The Skytraffix popup script uses a data-cfasync=false attribute to bypass Cloudflare's async script deferral and directly binds popup behavior to all anchor tags, images, and content areas on the page via bindTo: ['a','img','.content-area']. This means any click anywhere on the page can trigger a redirect or popup through idzone 151995. (location: page.html:555)

medium

social engineering

Page advertises content falsely labeled as 'real incest' (e.g., 'My Uncle can't get enough of me real incest', 'Real Incest Uncle Fucked me') which are fabricated claims designed to manipulate users into clicking and engaging with content under false pretenses. This is a social engineering tactic to drive engagement and ad revenue. (location: page.html:302-310, 472-480)

medium

hidden content

One video entry (video ID 45886) uses only emoji characters (transgender flag emoji) as both title and alt text with no descriptive content, effectively hiding the video's actual content from text-based scanners, search engine indexing, and content moderation tools while still being visible to users. (location: page.html:352-360)

medium

malicious redirect

A local /pop.js script is loaded in the page head before any other JavaScript, suggesting a popunder or redirect script that executes at page load before user interaction. The filename and placement are consistent with popunder ad network initialization. (location: page.html:32)

low

social engineering

The age_check variable in the page's inline JavaScript is set to 0 (disabled), meaning the site does not enforce any age verification despite hosting explicit adult content. This removes a legal and ethical barrier intended to prevent minors from accessing the content, and may be used to maximize traffic and ad impressions. (location: page.html:593)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/bestialitysextaboo.net

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is bestialitysextaboo.net safe for AI agents to use?

bestialitysextaboo.net currently scores 38/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.