Is baddies-only-lil-cake-albert-breaker-feat-tayson-kryss.hydr0.org safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
47/100

context safety score

A score of 47/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
82
behavior
60
content
24
graph
71

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

medium

malicious redirect

The page is hosted on baddies-only-lil-cake-albert-breaker-feat-tayson-kryss.hydr0.org but the canonical URL, all navigation links, stylesheets, and scripts point to mp3.cc. The scanned domain acts as a redirect/mirror that funnels users to mp3.cc, confirmed by the single redirect detected in Tier 2 signals. The relationship between the hydr0.org subdomain operator and mp3.cc is opaque. (location: page.html:9 (canonical link), page.html:18-19 (external resources from mp3.cc))

medium

brand impersonation

The site fully clones the MP3.cc brand — logo, title tag, meta og:site_name, footer copyright '© 2017–2026 MP3.cc', and all navigation links — while being served from a completely different domain (hydr0.org). Users and AI agents have no indication they are not on the legitimate mp3.cc domain. (location: page.html:5 (title), page.html:11 (og:site_name), page.html:310 (footer copyright))

low

hidden content

Four suspicious base64 blobs are embedded in the data-url attributes of playlist-play anchor tags (e.g., data-url values pointing to fine.sunproxy.net/file/<long-base64-string>/). These base64 strings are opaque encoded paths used to route MP3 file requests through the sunproxy.net proxy, obscuring the true origin and destination of served media files. (location: page.html:228, page.html:247, page.html:266, page.html:285 (data-url attributes))

medium

malicious redirect

All audio file play requests are proxied through fine.sunproxy.net rather than served directly. The sunproxy.net domain acts as an intermediary for media delivery, which could be used to track users, serve malicious payloads, or redirect to alternate content. The base64-encoded path segments obscure the actual file routing logic. (location: page.html:228 (data-url https://fine.sunproxy.net/file/NDgwdk...))

low

social engineering

The deceptive link flagged in Tier 2 corresponds to the 'Online Radio' sidebar link pointing to looz.net (an external third-party domain), presented within the navigation as if it were part of the MP3.cc service. The link opens in a new tab (_blank) and is styled identically to internal genre links, making it appear as a native feature. (location: page.html:204 (a href='https://looz.net/' class='z__important no-ajax' target='_blank'))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/baddies-only-lil-cake-albert-breaker-feat-tayson-kryss.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is baddies-only-lil-cake-albert-breaker-feat-tayson-kryss.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

baddies-only-lil-cake-albert-breaker-feat-tayson-kryss.hydr0.org currently scores 47/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.