Is bactrimqwx.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
41/100

context safety score

A score of 41/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
80
behavior
60
content
20
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page loads content in transparent or zero-size iframe overlay

high

malicious redirect

The page uses a JSONP callback (onCheqResponse) loaded from an external script at ob.sd559908.js.rsocdomains.com to immediately redirect the user to '/expired/result' with encoded parameters. This is a classic traffic distribution system (TDS) pattern used to redirect visitors based on bot/human detection, commonly employed in malvertising and phishing campaigns. (location: page.html:54-56, page.html:69-71)

high

hidden content

A zero-dimension hidden iframe (width='0' height='0' style='display:none') is loaded from obs.sd559908.js.rsocdomains.com as a noscript fallback, ensuring redirect/tracking behavior occurs even without JavaScript. This iframe is invisible to users and designed to operate covertly. (location: page.html:59-62)

medium

obfuscated code

External JavaScript is loaded from a suspicious third-party domain (rsocdomains.com) using a hashed filename (58518ef7cff0c8433a35a3a4a06ac5dd.js) with custom data attributes (data-ch, data-jsonp, class='ct_clicktrue_93106'). This pattern is consistent with cloaking infrastructure that serves different content to bots vs. humans, obscuring the true payload from automated scanners. (location: page.html:53-56)

medium

social engineering

The page displays a full-screen loading spinner (z-index: 9999) that covers all content and keeps users waiting while the bot-detection script runs and determines the redirect target. This creates a deceptive user experience designed to hold the visitor in place while traffic routing decisions are made server-side. (location: page.html:16-41, page.html:64-66, page.html:80-82)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/bactrimqwx.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is bactrimqwx.com safe for AI agents to use?

bactrimqwx.com currently scores 41/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 5, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.