Is babu88.gold safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
43/100

context safety score

A score of 43/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

12 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

brand impersonation

Site is hosted at babu88.gold but canonical URL and og:url reference babu88.com/Babu.com, and og:image/logo reference babu88.com. The .gold TLD domain impersonates the legitimate babu88.com brand, redirecting users to an unofficial clone that mimics the original brand identity. (location: page.html:<link rel=canonical href=https://Babu.com/>, <meta property=og:url content=https://Babu.com>, <meta property=og:image content=https://babu88.com/static/image/logo/logo.webp>)

high

malicious redirect

Conditional script injection based on hostname: if the host matches babu77.com, a third-party script is loaded from relaxafford.com (https://relaxafford.com/index.min.js?pk=0a835b6705616a8eef74222364713143). This domain is unrelated to Babu88 and appears to be an ad/affiliate network script dynamically injected to redirect or track users on alternate domains. (location: page.html:line 1, script block testing /\bbabu77\.com\b/.test(window.location.host))

medium

malicious redirect

Conditional script injection from afrdtech.com for babu77.com visitors: loads //afrdtech.com/v1/script.js with a tracking key (kmnrKey=838903960), harvesting URL parameters including campaign IDs, publisher, zone, and subzone data. This functions as an affiliate tracking/redirect network loaded only on the babu77.com variant. (location: page.html:line 180, kmnrSc.src = '//afrdtech.com/v1/script.js?kmnrKey=' + window.kmnr.kmnrKey)

medium

hidden content

A 1x1 pixel tracking image from rtmark.net is embedded in a <noscript> tag, invisibly syncing visitor data with a third-party partner ID (6e2fc7372543f85aea66b350ed081854169f8f00094605e28cb1692d80cd8302). This is a covert cross-site tracking beacon not disclosed to users. (location: page.html:line 228 (noscript), <img src="https://my.rtmark.net/img.gif?f=sync&lr=1&partner=6e2fc7372543f85aea66b350ed081854169f8f00094605e28cb1692d80cd8302" width=1 height=1>)

medium

hidden content

A hidden GTM iframe (height=0, width=0, display:none, visibility:hidden) is injected into the page body via a <noscript> block, silently loading Google Tag Manager for users without JavaScript. This obscures tracking activity from non-JS environments and security scanners. (location: page.html:line 221-227, iframe.src = 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-TKDZK9Q6' with display:none and visibility:hidden)

medium

brand impersonation

The page presents itself as Babu88 (a known Bangladesh online gambling/betting brand) but operates from the .gold TLD (babu88.gold) rather than the official domains. The HTML simultaneously references multiple alternate domains (babuplay.com, babu88.co, babu77.com, babu88l.com) with conditional branding injection, indicating a network of impersonation domains sharing one codebase. (location: page.html: multiple conditional blocks checking isBabuPlay, isBabuCo, isBabu77, isBabu88l hostnames)

medium

social engineering

The site promotes online gambling (cricket betting, live casino) targeted at Bangladesh users with messaging like 'Get your Free ID today', 'Special Promotions', and 'Fast Deposit/Withdrawal Methods' — classic social engineering tactics used to lure users into registering and depositing money on an unverified gambling platform operating under a suspicious .gold TLD. (location: page.html: <meta name=title content="Babu88 | Your preferred Cricket Exchange | Get your Free ID today">, <meta property=og:description>)

medium

credential harvesting

The site solicits user registration ('Register and experience the best Cricket Exchange') on a domain (babu88.gold) that is not the canonical brand domain (babu88.com). Users who register will submit credentials and potentially payment information to an unofficial domain whose ownership and data handling are unknown. (location: page.html: <meta property=og:description content="Register and experience the best Cricket Exchange in Bangladesh...">)

low

hidden content

ExoClick ad network script is loaded (https://a.exoclick.com/tag_gen.js) with a goal/publisher ID, which is an adult ad network commonly associated with intrusive and potentially malicious ad content. Its presence on a gambling site targeting Bangladesh users adds risk of malvertising. (location: page.html:line 185, <script src=https://a.exoclick.com/tag_gen.js data-goal=36c55a67042142c9590e8172a957d3b1>)

low

hidden content

Sportradar tag manager script (https://tm.ads.sportradar.com/dist/tag-manager.js) is injected with an obfuscated self-executing function, loading a third-party ad/analytics tag manager. The obfuscated IIFE pattern obscures what data is collected or transmitted. (location: page.html:line 192-191, sportradar tag manager IIFE injection with id STM-AAAAOB)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/babu88.gold

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is babu88.gold safe for AI agents to use?

babu88.gold currently scores 43/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.