Is b-o-b-feat-hayley-williams.hydr0.org safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
41/100

context safety score

A score of 41/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
82
behavior
60
content
14
graph
72

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

high

brand impersonation

The page is hosted on subdomain b-o-b-feat-hayley-williams.hydr0.org but fully impersonates mp3.cc, including its logo, branding, navigation, canonical URLs, og:site_name, og:url, og:image, CSS/JS assets, and footer copyright — all pointing to mp3.cc. The actual serving domain (hydr0.org) is distinct from the brand being impersonated (mp3.cc). (location: page.html:5-14, page.html:33-36, page.html:652)

medium

malicious redirect

The canonical link tag and all Open Graph URL metadata redirect users and crawlers to mp3.cc rather than the actual serving domain (hydr0.org). This creates a deceptive redirect signal: the page presents itself as residing at mp3.cc while actually served from a different domain. (location: page.html:9, page.html:14)

medium

malicious redirect

All audio file download/play links route through fine.sunproxy.net, a third-party proxy domain not affiliated with mp3.cc or hydr0.org. The base64-encoded URLs passed to this proxy obscure the final file destinations, creating an untrusted intermediary that could serve malicious payloads or track user activity. (location: page.html:228, page.html:247, page.html:266 (and all playlist data-url attributes))

low

hidden content

Twelve suspicious base64 blobs were flagged by the pre-scan. These correspond to the obfuscated file path tokens embedded in the fine.sunproxy.net URLs (e.g., NDgwdkFuTUxJZ0tHbEJUVFE0QUZz...). While these appear to be encoded file routing tokens rather than injected payloads, they obscure the true destination of all media file requests. (location: page.html:228, 247, 266, 285, 304, 323, 342, 361, 380, 399, 418, 437 (all data-url attributes))

low

social engineering

The site presents itself as a legitimate free MP3 download service impersonating the brand mp3.cc, which may deceive users into downloading files from an untrusted third-party proxy (fine.sunproxy.net) believing them to be sourced from the legitimate mp3.cc service. (location: page.html:5, page.html:33-36, page.html:652)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/b-o-b-feat-hayley-williams.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is b-o-b-feat-hayley-williams.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

b-o-b-feat-hayley-williams.hydr0.org currently scores 41/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.