Is awsdns-cn-03.biz safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
32/100

context safety score

A score of 32/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
45
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

critical

brand impersonation

Domain 'awsdns-cn-03.biz' impersonates Amazon Web Services (AWS) DNS infrastructure by mimicking the legitimate 'awsdns' naming convention used by Route 53 (e.g., ns-*.awsdns.com). The use of a .biz TLD combined with a country-code infix 'cn' and numeric suffix is a classic typosquatting/brand-impersonation pattern designed to deceive users and automated systems into trusting it as an official AWS DNS endpoint. (location: domain: awsdns-cn-03.biz)

critical

phishing

The domain closely mimics AWS Route 53 DNS nameserver naming (awsdns-XX.TLD) on a non-AWS TLD (.biz), consistent with infrastructure used in phishing campaigns targeting AWS customers or systems that perform DNS-based trust checks. TLS is not valid and the site did not connect successfully, which is consistent with a parked or early-stage phishing domain. (location: metadata.json: tls.connected=false, tls.cert_valid=false)

high

malicious redirect

The domain is unreachable via HTTPS (TLS connected=false, cert_valid=false, san_match=false) yet is registered and active. This pattern is common for domains held in reserve for malicious redirect infrastructure, DNS hijacking, or man-in-the-middle interception of traffic expecting legitimate AWS DNS responses. (location: metadata.json: tls block)

high

social engineering

The domain name 'awsdns-cn-03.biz' is crafted to appear as a legitimate AWS DNS server, which could socially engineer users, developers, or automated agents into trusting DNS responses, certificates, or network traffic originating from this domain. The authoritative-sounding numeric suffix and regional infix ('cn') reinforce false legitimacy. (location: domain: awsdns-cn-03.biz)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/awsdns-cn-03.biz

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is awsdns-cn-03.biz safe for AI agents to use?

awsdns-cn-03.biz currently scores 32/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.