context safety score
A score of 33/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
phishing
1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host
malicious redirect
The domain asicalismagrubu.org (meaning 'ASIC working group' in Turkish, implying a legitimate technical/professional organization) hosts a gambling/casino affiliate site. Links on the page redirect users to off-domain casino sites including cudiskongre.com (linked as 'Gates of Olympus'), jtaics.org (linked as 'Sweet Bonanza'), slotcasinositeleri2024.com (linked as 'slot siteleri'), demoslots.casino (linked as 'demo slot'), slotoyunlari.net (linked as 'Video slot oyunları'), and birbuketmeyve.com (linked as 'https://www.birbuketmeyve.com/'). These are deceptive outbound links — the anchor text displays legitimate-sounding or game names while redirecting to external gambling affiliate domains. (location: page.html lines 187, 195, 203, 213, 214, 248)
brand impersonation
The domain 'asicalismagrubu.org' translates to 'ASIC Working Group' in Turkish, which mimics the name of a legitimate professional or standards organization. The site is actually a Turkish gambling/casino affiliate content farm. This domain name is misleading and could deceive users or automated agents into believing the content is from a legitimate technical or standards body. (location: metadata.json, page.html line 12)
social engineering
The site promotes illegal online gambling ('illegal canlı kumar siteleri' — the page itself admits the Empire Fortune game is found on 'illegal live gambling sites') and encourages users to register accounts on external casino sites to play slots, framing gambling as a straightforward money-making activity. This constitutes social engineering to lure users into unregulated or illegal gambling platforms. (location: page.html line 232, page-text.txt line 99)
hidden content
The site branding elements (.site-title, .site-description, .site-branding) are explicitly hidden using CSS with 'position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px); display:none'. This suppresses the true site identity from visual display while still exposing it to crawlers and AI agents, a common SEO cloaking and identity-concealment technique. (location: page.html lines 88-103)
malicious redirect
The hosting provider is flagged as 'Bulletproof' hosting, a type of infrastructure specifically known for hosting malicious, illegal, or abuse-resistant content. Combined with the gambling affiliate content and deceptive domain name, this significantly elevates the risk profile of outbound links on this page. (location: metadata.json hosting.reputation)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/asicalismagrubu.orgCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
asicalismagrubu.org currently scores 33/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.