Is arizona-zervas-feat-john-wolf.hydr0.org safe?

cautionmedium confidence
59/100

context safety score

A score of 59/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
82
behavior
80
content
40
graph
71

5 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

The page is hosted on 'arizona-zervas-feat-john-wolf.hydr0.org' but presents content cloned from 'mp3.cc', with a canonical tag pointing to 'https://mp3.cc/t/2658182773-arizona-zervas-feat-john-wolf/'. The subdomain 'hydr0.org' is unrelated to mp3.cc, indicating a redirect/mirror site that serves mp3.cc content under a different domain. The pre-scan context also noted 1 redirect. Audio file URLs route through 'fine.sunproxy.net', a third-party proxy domain not affiliated with mp3.cc. (location: page.html:9 (canonical tag), page.html:228,247,266,285,304,323,342 (data-url attributes))

high

brand impersonation

The site at 'hydr0.org' fully impersonates MP3.cc (mp3.cc), reproducing its logo, layout, branding, CSS/JS assets, and content. All visual elements, navigation, and page structure are identical to mp3.cc while operating from an entirely different domain. The footer retains the original copyright notice '© 2017 – 2026 MP3.cc' and contact email 'hydrofm@yandex.com', falsely attributing the site to the legitimate brand. (location: page.html:5 (title), page.html:11 (og:site_name), page.html:33-36 (logo), page.html:367 (footer copyright))

medium

malicious redirect

All audio playback URLs route through 'fine.sunproxy.net', a third-party proxy not operated by mp3.cc. Each audio file URL contains a long base64-encoded path segment (matching the 7 suspicious base64 blobs flagged in Tier 2 analysis). This proxy intercepts all media requests and could serve malicious payloads, track users, or redirect to exploit pages instead of or in addition to serving audio files. (location: page.html:228,247,266,285,304,323,342 (data-url attributes pointing to fine.sunproxy.net))

medium

social engineering

The site mimics a legitimate free MP3 download service (MP3.cc) to lure users into clicking download and play links that route through unaffiliated third-party infrastructure (fine.sunproxy.net, hydr0.org). Users trusting the familiar MP3.cc brand may unknowingly interact with proxied or substituted content. The domain name 'arizona-zervas-feat-john-wolf.hydr0.org' is crafted to appear as a direct music search result, increasing the likelihood of user trust. (location: page.html:1-448 (overall page structure and domain))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/arizona-zervas-feat-john-wolf.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is arizona-zervas-feat-john-wolf.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

arizona-zervas-feat-john-wolf.hydr0.org currently scores 59/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.