context safety score
A score of 37/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
phishing
1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host
malicious redirect
script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source
brand impersonation
Site distributes modified ('Mod') APKs of major commercial titles including Minecraft, GTA San Andreas, GTA Vice City, Red Dead Redemption, Stardew Valley, Terraria, WWE 2K25, YouTube Premium, FaceApp Pro, MX Player Pro, ES File Explorer PRO, and Nintendo 3DS Emulator (Citra) without authorization from the respective rights holders. Offering cracked/modded paid apps under the original brand names constitutes brand impersonation and exposes users to potentially trojaned binaries. (location: page.html lines 35-75, page-text.txt lines 38-75)
social engineering
The site systematically presents pirated and modified versions of paid, well-known commercial software (YouTube Premium Vanced 'No Ads', FaceApp Pro 'Pro unlock', GTA titles with 'Unlimited Money/Full Unlock', WWE 2K25 'Unlocked Full') as free downloads, using official app icons and branding to lure users into downloading unverified APK files that could contain malware or spyware. (location: page.html lines 75, page-text.txt lines 75)
malicious redirect
Static assets (favicon, icons, search icon, nav icons) are loaded from a subtly different domain 'apkawards.com' (with an extra 's') rather than the primary domain 'apkaward.com'. This domain divergence could indicate a secondary infrastructure used to track or redirect users, or an attempt to normalize a typosquat domain alongside the legitimate-looking primary domain. (location: page.html line 1 (apple-touch-icon, shortcut icon href attributes pointing to apkawards.com), page.html line 3 (search icon URL apkawards.com))
brand impersonation
The page offers 'YouTube Premium Vanced APK + Mod: No Ads' using Google's official YouTube app icon (com.google.android.youtube package name) and branding, directly impersonating Google's paid YouTube Premium service to distribute an unauthorized modified APK. (location: page.html line 75, page-text.txt line 75)
hidden content
CSS style rules are embedded inline throughout the page body and also appear verbatim in page-text.txt (the visible text extraction), suggesting CSS/style blocks were not properly separated from rendered content. While this may be a scraper artifact, inline style injection mixed with content can be used to hide text from visual rendering while keeping it accessible to parsers or AI agents. (location: page-text.txt lines 1, 5-6, 74, 82-83)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/apkaward.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
apkaward.com currently scores 37/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.