Is animeworld.ac safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
41/100

context safety score

A score of 41/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
60
content
10
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

obfuscated code

Large inline script uses a Caesar-cipher-style character rotation obfuscation to decode and execute a string payload at runtime. The technique involves a scrambled string 'm' decoded via charCodeAt arithmetic, then used to build dynamic property names and URLs. This pattern is characteristic of malvertising loaders and click-fraud scripts that hide their true purpose from static analysis. (location: page.html, line 724)

high

malicious redirect

Third-party script loaded from 'bobsleddomesticglandular.com/on.js' — a domain with a randomly-assembled, nonsensical name (classic domain generation algorithm / ad-fraud pattern). It is loaded with data-cfasync='false' to bypass Cloudflare filtering, and its onload/onerror callbacks invoke an undeclared global function 'archxtu(15)', suggesting it orchestrates further payload execution or redirect logic. (location: page.html, line 725)

medium

malicious redirect

Two ad-tag scripts loaded from '//aqle3.com/btag.min.js' (a known ad-network domain associated with aggressive ad injection and potential malvertising). Loaded via protocol-relative URLs, bypassing mixed-content warnings, and flagged data-cfasync='false' to avoid Cloudflare scrutiny. (location: page.html, lines 4278 and 7620)

medium

obfuscated code

The inline obfuscated script references a global 'handleException' variable as a conditional hook and uses dynamic string construction to assemble URLs and object keys at runtime, making static analysis of its network destinations impossible without execution. (location: page.html, line 724)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/animeworld.ac

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is animeworld.ac safe for AI agents to use?

animeworld.ac currently scores 41/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.