Is allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
32/100

context safety score

A score of 32/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
45
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

critical

brand impersonation

Domain 'allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top' impersonates Allegro Lokalnie, a major Polish e-commerce marketplace, by prepending 'allegrolokalnie' as a subdomain prefix on a randomly-generated, clearly fraudulent domain (gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top). This is a classic brand spoofing pattern designed to deceive users into believing they are visiting the legitimate Allegro platform. (location: domain: allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top)

critical

phishing

The domain structure — a well-known brand name prefixed to a randomized gibberish domain — is a hallmark of phishing infrastructure. The TLS connection failed (connected=false, cert_valid=false), meaning the site either serves content over HTTP or has a broken/expired certificate, consistent with hastily-deployed phishing pages. The combination of brand impersonation + invalid TLS + random domain strongly indicates an active phishing campaign targeting Allegro Lokalnie users. (location: domain: allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top, TLS: connected=false, cert_valid=false)

high

credential harvesting

Sites impersonating Allegro Lokalnie typically present fake login pages to harvest user credentials (email, password) and/or payment card details. The domain pattern is consistent with known credential-harvesting phishing kits targeting Polish e-commerce users. (location: domain: allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top)

high

social engineering

The use of the legitimate brand name 'allegrolokalnie' at the start of the subdomain is a deliberate social engineering tactic to reduce user suspicion and increase click-through and form submission rates. Users scanning a URL quickly may see 'allegrolokalnie' and assume legitimacy without inspecting the full domain. (location: domain: allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top safe for AI agents to use?

allegrolokalnie.gsfs-gtnygds-asfde4.top currently scores 32/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 6, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.