Is allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
34/100

context safety score

A score of 34/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
37
behavior
100
content
10
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

critical

brand impersonation

The domain 'allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd' impersonates Allegro Lokalnie, a major Polish online marketplace (allegro.pl / allegrolokalnie.pl). The use of a lookalike subdomain-style prefix with a suspicious .cfd TLD is a classic brand impersonation technique designed to deceive users into believing they are visiting the legitimate Allegro Lokalnie platform. (location: domain: allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd)

critical

phishing

The domain mimics a trusted e-commerce brand (Allegro Lokalnie) using a fraudulent TLD (.cfd — commonly associated with scam/phishing infrastructure). TLS connection failed entirely (connected=false, cert_valid=false), indicating the site either is non-functional, behind a gateway that strips TLS, or was taken down after deployment — all consistent with phishing site lifecycle patterns. (location: domain: allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd, TLS metadata)

high

credential harvesting

Domains impersonating Allegro Lokalnie are routinely used to harvest login credentials, payment card data, and personal information from Polish users expecting to interact with the legitimate marketplace. The combination of brand impersonation and a throwaway .cfd TLD strongly indicates credential harvesting intent, even though the page content could not be retrieved. (location: domain: allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd)

medium

malicious redirect

The .cfd TLD and numeric subdomain pattern (75845.cfd) is consistent with bulletproof hosting or redirect infrastructure used to chain victims through intermediate domains before landing on phishing pages. The TLS failure may indicate the page has already rotated or the domain serves as a redirect node. (location: domain: allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd, hosting: Unknown)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd safe for AI agents to use?

allegrolokalnie.75845.cfd currently scores 34/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 6, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.