context safety score
A score of 57/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.
phishing
1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host
malicious redirect
script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source
social engineering
Site displays a persistent popup notice (noticeContent) urging users to bookmark alternative domains, with text stating 'blocking is severe, remember these addresses to come home' (屏蔽严重，记住以下网址回家). Popup promotes omoo.app and fb.omoo.tv as alternative domains and encourages users to share the site with friends. This is a social engineering tactic to maintain user base across domain changes and evade enforcement actions. (location: page.html: .noticeContent popup div, inline script with domainList)
malicious redirect
Core JavaScript libraries (jQuery 3.3.1, jquery-cookie, jquery.lazyload, index.js) are loaded from the unrecognized third-party CDN domain s6.cfhls.top via protocol-relative URLs (//s6.cfhls.top/...). This CDN is not a known major provider and could serve tampered scripts. User avatar assets also load from as.cfhls.top. If this CDN is compromised or malicious, all users would execute attacker-controlled code. (location: page.html: <script src='//s6.cfhls.top/1/player/js/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js'>, //s6.cfhls.top/1/template/the4/statics/js/index.js, //s6.cfhls.top/1/player/js/jquery-cookie/1.4.1/jquery.cookie.min.js, //s6.cfhls.top/1/player/js/jquery.lazyload/1.9.1/jquery.lazyload.min.js)
brand impersonation
The domain list includes 'https://www.acg2day.org' labeled as '风车动漫' (Fengche/Windmill Anime), but actual Fengche-branded sites use fengche*.com domains (fengche211.com, fengche11.com, fengche985.com also listed). Similarly 'https://www.acg2day.net' is labeled 'ACG动漫' while this site itself is also branded 'ACG动漫'. Multiple sites in the partner list share the same brand names (e.g., 'AGE动漫' used for agekkk.com, agebibi.com, age211.com, age985.com), suggesting a network of mirror sites using well-known brand names to attract traffic. (location: page.html: inline domainList JS variable; <a href='https://www.acg2day.org'>风车动漫</a>)
social engineering
The site prominently features a '防走丢' (anti-lost/don't lose us) link pointing to fb.omoo.tv, a separate domain used to publish updated site URLs. This pattern is common among gray-market or piracy sites anticipating domain seizure or blocking, and is designed to retain users by directing them to follow-on infrastructure regardless of enforcement actions. (location: page.html: <a href='https://fb.omoo.tv' target='_blank'>防走丢</a> in header navigation and noticeContent popup)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/acgkkkk.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
acgkkkk.com currently scores 57/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.