Is a-day-to-remember.hydr0.org safe?

cautionmedium confidence
68/100

context safety score

A score of 68/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
82
behavior
80
content
57
graph
75

5 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

The domain a-day-to-remember.hydr0.org redirects to mp3.cc, a third-party MP3 download site. The subdomain uses the band name 'A Day To Remember' as a lure, and the canonical URL and all content point to mp3.cc. This is a typosquat/lure subdomain pattern used to redirect users searching for legitimate content. (location: page.html:9 - canonical href and metadata.json redirect signal)

medium

brand impersonation

The subdomain a-day-to-remember.hydr0.org impersonates the band 'A Day To Remember' by using their name in the subdomain and page title ('A Day To Remember | Download mp3 free, listen music online - MP3.cc'). This exploits brand recognition to lure users to a third-party MP3 download service. (location: page.html:5, .brin-context.md - domain: a-day-to-remember.hydr0.org)

medium

malicious redirect

All audio file play URLs route through 'fine.sunproxy.net', a third-party proxy/CDN service with an opaque base64-encoded path. This indirection layer obfuscates the true destination of media file downloads and could facilitate tracking, substitution of content, or delivery of malicious payloads. This accounts for the 12 suspicious base64 blobs flagged in Tier 2. (location: page.html:228,247,266,285,304,323,342,361,380,399,418,437,456,475,494,513,532,551,570,589,608,627 - data-url attributes pointing to fine.sunproxy.net/file/<base64>)

low

social engineering

The page presents itself as a free MP3 download site offering copyrighted music from 'A Day To Remember', Frank Sinatra, and other artists without authorization indicators. This is a common social engineering pattern to attract users seeking free content and expose them to potentially harmful downloads or tracking via the sunproxy.net proxy layer. (location: page.html:224-642 - playlist section offering free copyrighted music downloads)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/a-day-to-remember.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is a-day-to-remember.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

a-day-to-remember.hydr0.org currently scores 68/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.