Is 5movierulz.condos safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
49/100

context safety score

A score of 49/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
60
content
30
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

malicious redirect

The page is served under domain 5movierulz.condos but the Cloudflare challenge zone (cZone) is set to 'www.5movierulz.bargains', indicating the canonical/actual site operates under a different domain. This cross-domain mismatch is characteristic of domain-hopping infrastructure used by piracy/malware distribution networks to evade blocklists and redirect users across rotating domains. (location: page.html: _cf_chl_opt.cZone = 'www.5movierulz.bargains')

high

brand impersonation

The domain '5movierulz.condos' (and its associated domain 'www.5movierulz.bargains') impersonates the well-known piracy brand 'MovieRulz'. These sites are consistently associated with malware distribution, forced redirects to ad/scam pages, and credential harvesting. The use of multiple TLDs (.condos, .bargains) is a known evasion tactic employed by this network after repeated domain seizures. (location: metadata.json: domain=5movierulz.condos; page.html: cZone=www.5movierulz.bargains)

medium

malicious redirect

A meta http-equiv refresh tag is present with a 360-second countdown, which will silently redirect the browser without user interaction after the Cloudflare challenge phase. This is a common technique to chain users through intermediate pages before landing on ad-fraud, malware, or phishing destinations. (location: page.html: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="360">)

medium

hidden content

The page sets meta robots to 'noindex,nofollow', suppressing crawler and search engine visibility of the actual page content. Combined with the Cloudflare managed challenge gate, this hides the true destination and payloads from automated scanners and indexers, a deliberate obfuscation technique used by malicious sites. (location: page.html: <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow">)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/5movierulz.condos

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is 5movierulz.condos safe for AI agents to use?

5movierulz.condos currently scores 49/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.