Is 4014692230.hydr0.org safe?

cautionmedium confidence
52/100

context safety score

A score of 52/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
82
behavior
80
content
27
graph
71

6 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

brand impersonation

The page is served from subdomain 4014692230.hydr0.org but fully impersonates MP3.cc — using MP3.cc's title, logo, canonical URL (https://mp3.cc/), Open Graph metadata, all internal links pointing to mp3.cc, and even the copyright notice '© 2017–2026 MP3.cc'. A user or AI agent visiting this URL would have no indication they are not on the legitimate mp3.cc domain. (location: page.html:5,9,11,14,33,1184 — <title>, canonical, og:url, og:site_name, logo href, footer copyright)

high

malicious redirect

The scanned URL https://4014692230.hydr0.org redirects (1 redirect recorded in .brin-context.md) and serves content cloned from mp3.cc. All media play links route through a third-party proxy domain 'fine.sunproxy.net' rather than mp3.cc's own infrastructure, silently routing audio file requests through an unrelated intermediary that could log, modify, or monetize traffic. (location: page.html:228,247,266 — data-url attributes pointing to https://fine.sunproxy.net/file/...)

medium

brand impersonation

All 40+ MP3 file download URLs embed '(Hydr0.org)' in the filename (e.g., 'Maluma_-_Corazon_(Hydr0.org).mp3'), while the UI presents links pointing to mp3.cc. This reveals the files are served under the hydr0.org brand identity while the page pretends to be mp3.cc, indicating deliberate deceptive rebranding of media assets. (location: page.html:228,247,266,285 — data-url filenames containing (Hydr0.org).mp3)

medium

malicious redirect

All audio file URLs use long base64-encoded path tokens served from fine.sunproxy.net, a proxy/relay service. These opaque tokens obscure the true file origin and allow the intermediary to perform traffic interception, ad injection, or redirect chaining without user awareness. 12 suspicious base64 blobs were flagged in pre-scan. (location: page.html:228 — https://fine.sunproxy.net/file/NDgwdkFuTUx... (and 39 similar instances))

low

social engineering

The site presents itself as a free MP3 download service for popular copyrighted songs (Taylor Swift, Drake, Post Malone, etc.) to attract high user traffic under false legitimacy, while actually operating from an unrelated numeric subdomain. This bait-and-switch approach exploits user trust in the MP3.cc brand to drive engagement with a rogue infrastructure. (location: page.html:224 — playlist of popular songs; page-text.txt:131)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/4014692230.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is 4014692230.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

4014692230.hydr0.org currently scores 52/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.