context safety score
A score of 41/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
brand impersonation
Domain 30filmywap.com impersonates the well-known piracy brand 'Filmywap' (filmywap.com) by prepending '30' to the name. The site presents itself as 'Filmywap (Official) 2026' and uses Filmywap branding, logos, and titles to deceive users into believing it is the legitimate site. (location: page.html:9,31,73,137 — meta title, page title, header image alt text, footer copyright)
malicious redirect
The canonical URL declared on 30filmywap.com points to https://www.35filmywap.com/, a different domain. All navigation links, search form actions, and content links also redirect to 35filmywap.com rather than staying on the current domain. This pattern is consistent with a doorway/redirect site designed to funnel traffic from one typosquat to another. (location: page.html:8 — <link rel='canonical' href='https://www.35filmywap.com/'>, page.html:107 — form action='https://www.35filmywap.com/mobile/search', page.html:112–118 — all content and category links pointing to 35filmywap.com)
brand impersonation
The site references and links to numerous other known piracy site brand names (mp4moviez, 9kmovies, 9xmovies, filmyzilla, movierulz, etc.) as internal navigation links, creating an SEO keyword farm that impersonates a network of piracy brands to capture search traffic. (location: page.html:125 — h4 block with links to /mp4moviez/, /9kmovies/, /9xmovies/, etc.)
social engineering
The site promotes free download of copyrighted movies and web series (Netflix, OTT, Bollywood, Hollywood) framed as a legitimate community service. Language such as 'Filmywap (Official)' and descriptions of 'community' and 'collaborative environment' are used to build false trust and legitimacy to encourage users to engage with potentially malicious download links. (location: page.html:84–90, page-text.txt:13–19 — descriptive body text; page.html:137 — 'Filmywap (Official) 2026')
social engineering
A Telegram channel link (t.me/filmywapbollywood) is prominently promoted via a banner image, a common social engineering technique used by piracy and malware distribution networks to move users to less-regulated platforms where further exploitation (malware links, credential harvesting) can occur. (location: page.html:81 — <a href='https://t.me/filmywapbollywood'>)
hidden content
The domain is only 59 days old but presents itself as an established, official brand ('Filmywap Official 2026 All right reserved'). The site uses a WAP/mobile DTD (XHTML Mobile 1.0) while serving full desktop-style content, and employs SEO meta stuffing with competitor brand keywords (filmyzilla 2026) hidden from visible display, indicating deliberate deceptive SEO manipulation. (location: page.html:1 — WAP DOCTYPE declaration; page.html:11 — keywords meta tag containing 'filmyzilla 2026'; metadata.json — domain_age_days: 59)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/30filmywap.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
30filmywap.com currently scores 41/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.